Just laying this out there - but you never have to clear anything up for me again. Please don't go out of your way on my account.
I'd hate to make this discussion thread concept seem like a discussion or some such. :) Carry on.
I'm still not seeing where anyone is saying "take the record away!" based on hearsay. I have seen many say that it should be reviewed because of the previous record-holder and general fairness concerns and there's seemingly legitimate claims it was snagged.
Interesting question for you: Why...
yep - all the big pig walleyes I have caught eventually wrap themselves up in the line and upon being netted they somehow free themselves
I’m now convinced it’s legitimate and can move on
since when do four organizations write group letters, “signed” by the names of the orgs, not individuals representing those orgs?
that letter is goofier than a pet coon
- - - Updated - - -
and who is that document addressed to?
bizarre
ha ha - let's look back at least year's walleye - did he get the third degree? no
because witnesses and conditions didn't warrant scrutiny - this case is different - why make it sound like this scrutiny is common?
Like I said really early on in this, the money is going to control where this goes in the long game.
Not constituent desires. Not what makes sense for the average Joe. There are enough sparsely populated districts that "all those disenfranchised hunters or landowners who like it the old way"...
Ha ha - jk - I’m full of it.
I just pitch blindly until it gets hard to reel. At that point, a patented double hookset, and I reel the retard in. Or break off. Either way I’m fishin!
90% of the time white nano shows up well enough. And it never fades.
I'm a chronic linewatcher. I like to watch for changes in the nano's slight coils themselves. They are an uber-sensitive indicator.
Enough. I've already said too much.