What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pigsticker" data-source="post: 446919" data-attributes="member: 209"><p>Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn.</p><p></p><p>Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. </p><p></p><p>Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. </p><p></p><p>Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments…</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]74661[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pigsticker, post: 446919, member: 209"] Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn. Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments… [ATTACH type="full"]74661[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: Slappy
Today at 12:51 AM
Meindl, Crispi, Lowa? Boots?
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Bassmasters Classic Champion
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:48 PM
Pill Bottle Turkey Call
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:28 PM
Nichole Rice trial
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 10:09 PM
P
Worst text sent by mistake...
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 9:56 PM
Open water?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 9:31 PM
T
2137 House side
Latest: tman
Yesterday at 9:13 PM
9mm
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:31 PM
Real Estate Taxes
Latest: bravo
Yesterday at 8:16 PM
R
Memes
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 6:30 PM
Another 380 or not
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Spring Snows
Latest: Trip McNeely
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
A
Minot gun show
Latest: AR-15
Yesterday at 3:56 PM
R
2025 BCW Walleye Tournament
Latest: rodcontrol
Yesterday at 3:10 PM
N
Hunting Somali Pirates
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 11:00 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 8:05 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 6:52 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Jiffy
Monday at 11:49 AM
W
Livescope portable boat mount
Latest: WalleyeGuy80
Monday at 11:38 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
Top
Bottom