What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pigsticker" data-source="post: 446919" data-attributes="member: 209"><p>Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn.</p><p></p><p>Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. </p><p></p><p>Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. </p><p></p><p>Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments…</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]74661[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pigsticker, post: 446919, member: 209"] Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn. Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments… [ATTACH type="full"]74661[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
ND Constitutional measure
Latest: wslayer
28 minutes ago
Shorthairs
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 7:07 AM
Generation X
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 5:54 AM
Vinegar/Sand?!! YT AI
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
M
The Geraldo vault, but better!
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 3:10 PM
Yukon Clam flip over ice shack
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:10 PM
Sporting Clays
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 12:47 PM
V
36v minnkota ulterra 60"
Latest: v193
Yesterday at 11:17 AM
No Bag Limit
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 10:31 AM
Voltiq Reel Hype
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 10:03 AM
Deep fission reactors
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:04 AM
Diablo Sandwich
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 8:39 PM
Does The .22 Bounce in Skulls?
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 7:29 PM
B
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Bob
Tuesday at 5:33 PM
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: lunkerslayer
Tuesday at 6:10 AM
Fred Bear videos
Latest: lunkerslayer
Monday at 11:22 PM
O
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Monday at 10:16 PM
Mille Lacs lake
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 8:22 PM
Graph Help!
Latest: sweeney
Monday at 5:15 PM
61.26 lbs, 1 day on Fort Peck
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 12:29 PM
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Monday at 10:35 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
Top
Bottom