What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pigsticker" data-source="post: 446919" data-attributes="member: 209"><p>Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn.</p><p></p><p>Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. </p><p></p><p>Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. </p><p></p><p>Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments…</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]74661[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pigsticker, post: 446919, member: 209"] Turns out there has been an overwhelming negative response to Rep Andersons amendments and has all sorts of supporters, both hunters and non hunters up in arms about this. There has been significant public pressure from his constituents and others towards him and the committee that it is rumored that the proposed amendments will be withdrawn. Let’s hope that is the case as the way they were written were borderline anti-hunting, benefitted only large tract land owners and circumvented the voice of North Dakotans who fought to preserve the ability to feed wildlife in the toughest months to help wildlife thrive in this extreme climate. Please contact your reps and ask them for a Do Pass on SB 2137 as it was presented to the house, without any further amendments! It takes all of us. Here was the bill with Representative Anderson’s proposed amendments… [ATTACH type="full"]74661[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Outdoor adventure bucket lis
Latest: MSA
Today at 11:25 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 11:03 AM
Soybeans
Latest: D-Racer
Today at 11:00 AM
Any youth hunter stories?
Latest: jpv
Today at 10:15 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: risingsun
Today at 10:04 AM
Cocks
Latest: johnr
Today at 9:22 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:13 AM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 6:55 AM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 9:53 PM
Doorbell Cameras
Latest: Lou63
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
Pressure treat and alum
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Sale
Astrostart
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 10:26 AM
O
Sak
Van Hook 8-26-27-2026
Latest: OL Deadeye
Yesterday at 8:52 AM
Weekend project
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:19 AM
B
2013 Ice Castle 8x20
Latest: Bauer
Yesterday at 7:32 AM
N
RR
Red River 9-2-26
Latest: nanibis94
Yesterday at 3:35 AM
O
Ice house 250.00
Latest: otterwood
Sunday at 9:57 PM
"Back Strap" Diane YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:01 PM
H
RR
Red River 9-16-26
Latest: hankowl89
Sunday at 5:45 PM
Free
Scheels Recluse bow to young h
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 4:10 PM
T
Morning Doves
Latest: Traxion
Sunday at 3:21 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
2137 House side
Top
Bottom