What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
A win for Sportsmen
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fritz the Cat" data-source="post: 289821" data-attributes="member: 605"><p>Good morning PG,</p><p></p><p>Did you look at Trump's budget proposal for 2021? Keep in mind it is only a proposal. Page 63. What it says:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/budget_fy21.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/budget_fy21.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>"The Budget proposes to eliminate line-item land acquisition projects funding, saving taxpayers $132 million relative to the 2020 enacted level. Eliminating land acquisition projects funding would allow DOI to focus resources on visitor services and facility repairs in existing national parks, refuges, and public lands, which already encompass nearly 500 million acres."</p><p></p><p>PG, does that makes sense to you? The National Parks and other federal holdings have a maintenance backlog of perhaps $20 Billion. Does it make more sense to work on those 500 million acres or buy more?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fritz the Cat, post: 289821, member: 605"] Good morning PG, Did you look at Trump's budget proposal for 2021? Keep in mind it is only a proposal. Page 63. What it says: [url]https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/budget_fy21.pdf[/url] "The Budget proposes to eliminate line-item land acquisition projects funding, saving taxpayers $132 million relative to the 2020 enacted level. Eliminating land acquisition projects funding would allow DOI to focus resources on visitor services and facility repairs in existing national parks, refuges, and public lands, which already encompass nearly 500 million acres." PG, does that makes sense to you? The National Parks and other federal holdings have a maintenance backlog of perhaps $20 Billion. Does it make more sense to work on those 500 million acres or buy more? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Gas prices
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 1:19 AM
Lawnmower starting issue
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:45 PM
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:29 PM
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:14 PM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
Scientists?
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:36 PM
RIP Kyle Busch
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 6:13 PM
5.3 GM ?
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 5:35 PM
S
Young Mallard Hen
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 2:10 PM
NWT Mobridge 2026
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:04 PM
Tour Level Gold - Sak
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 12:10 AM
Food porn
Latest: Davy Crockett
Thursday at 10:26 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Lycanthrope
Thursday at 2:04 PM
Walleye Spawn
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 10:12 AM
S
Minnesota on fire...
Latest: snow2
Wednesday at 9:20 PM
Muskie/Pike/Pickerel/Bladder
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:03 PM
W
Garrison Tailrace
Latest: walleyewanker
Wednesday at 11:47 AM
S
Sporting Clays
Latest: snow2
Wednesday at 10:45 AM
M
Transfer of Public Land in ND
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:44 AM
RR
Red River 5-20-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Wednesday at 7:13 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
A win for Sportsmen
Top
Bottom