Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BBQBluesMan" data-source="post: 201780" data-attributes="member: 1007">Speaking of orgs and their agendas and what to expect down the road…. if it were up to North Dakota Farm Bureau and others there would be no public land as they support the sale of public land to the private sector, all wetlands would be drained, non-residents would have no hunting restrictions in ND, existing and future wildlife and conservation easements would be bought out/erased/outlawed, state school land be sold in its entirety to active ag producers, every tillable acre should have drain tile, no support for a CRP type program, the list goes on. They want the cake and to eat it too. And they want OUR public lands. SMH <a href="https://www.ndfb.org/image/cache/2017_NDFB_Policy_Book.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.ndfb.org/image/cache/2017_NDFB_Policy_Book.pdf</a><a href="http://ndfu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-Program-of-Policy-and-Action.pdf" target="_blank">http://ndfu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-Program-of-Policy-and-Action.pdf</a>  We oppose limiting the number of out-of-state hunters and/or trappers or any difference in season limitations between resident and non-resident hunters.---ID#: 2040/16 We oppose any tax revenue from oil or gas going to conservation groups and using any money from the outdoor heritage fund to pay for a state funded conservation reserve program replacement or substitute.---ID#: 2055/16  We support efforts to control the black bird and Canada goose population to the point where it is no longer an economic problem for agriculture.---ID#: 2064/16 We support a no net gain of government or conservation group-owned land, county by county and state by state.---ID#: 1871/17 We oppose the allocation of any additional state funds being given to groups/organizations for the purpose of conservation projects, conservation easements and/or land acquisitions.---ID#: 1886/17 We oppose the gifting of public lands to any organization; however, we support the sale of federal and state land back to the private sector.---ID#: 1051/16 We support the agricultural use of drain tile both as a conservation tool and as a flood mitigation tool. We oppose regulatory policy of damming or blocking drain tile without just compensation.--- ID#: 1549/17 We encourage state, counties, and townships to help and not hinder field tiling, since it helps reduce top soil erosion and reduces runoff water, thus improving the overall quality of water going down our stre ams.---I D#: 2041/16  We propose that all farmable land be exempt from wetlands designation and be eligible for drainage.---ID#: 1131/17 We support a mediation program concerning nuisance wetlands in North Dakota.---ID#: 1957/15We support property owners' rights to drain their own property into a natural wetland.---ID#: 1576/15 We oppose the federal "wild and scenic" designation for any rivers and their tributaries in North Dakota and oppose wilderness land designation in the state.---ID#: 2085/16- - - Updated - - -measure 5 was a failure and was doomed from the start. Poorly written. With that said don't think for a minute that 80 percent of North Dakotans are against conservation in this state. Simply not true.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA