What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
April Blizzard Predicted next week
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 342165" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Frost may not be all the way out yet, but it's getting pretty deep all across ND.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.ndawn.ndsu.nodak.edu/deep-soil-temperatures.html" target="_blank">https://www.ndawn.ndsu.nodak.edu/deep-soil-temperatures.html</a></p><p></p><p>I love having this data available to us nowadays, 10 years ago there were like 2 or 3 soil temp profiles in the entire state. Now we are starting to get some pretty good density of data.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, 20 inches of thawed out soil can easily hold 4 inches of water with an average porosity of 20-25%, and that's using a fairly low expectation for soil porosity in ND. Locally, it can easily be roughly twice that. And that's what leads a person to the conclusion of there is plenty of storage capacity in the soil, so it becomes a non-simple math problem of rain rates + melt rates - infiltration rates (via hydraulic conductivities for said soils) equals expected runoff. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And to db-2, yes. That is a common observation this year and we rarely see much runoff from soil induced melting of the snow and ice. It's just too slow overall. Maybe on a really nice sunny day in the spring will you see an inch or so of snow-water equivalent converted from snow to liquid water. Rainfall though, especially in a thunderstorm can easily exceed a rate of 2-3 inches per hour. That's when you see a lot of runoff because the rainfall rate has greatly exceeded the infiltration rate (not overall capacity) of the soil. So long as the drainages are clear, that water gets in motion and generally stays in motion.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>At least we will have company with the unpleasant weather theme.</p><p></p><p>https://twitter.com/NWSReno/status/1516767775968174094/photo/2</p><p></p><p>Good for them, they need it as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 342165, member: 389"] Frost may not be all the way out yet, but it's getting pretty deep all across ND. [url]https://www.ndawn.ndsu.nodak.edu/deep-soil-temperatures.html[/url] I love having this data available to us nowadays, 10 years ago there were like 2 or 3 soil temp profiles in the entire state. Now we are starting to get some pretty good density of data. FWIW, 20 inches of thawed out soil can easily hold 4 inches of water with an average porosity of 20-25%, and that's using a fairly low expectation for soil porosity in ND. Locally, it can easily be roughly twice that. And that's what leads a person to the conclusion of there is plenty of storage capacity in the soil, so it becomes a non-simple math problem of rain rates + melt rates - infiltration rates (via hydraulic conductivities for said soils) equals expected runoff. And to db-2, yes. That is a common observation this year and we rarely see much runoff from soil induced melting of the snow and ice. It's just too slow overall. Maybe on a really nice sunny day in the spring will you see an inch or so of snow-water equivalent converted from snow to liquid water. Rainfall though, especially in a thunderstorm can easily exceed a rate of 2-3 inches per hour. That's when you see a lot of runoff because the rainfall rate has greatly exceeded the infiltration rate (not overall capacity) of the soil. So long as the drainages are clear, that water gets in motion and generally stays in motion. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] At least we will have company with the unpleasant weather theme. https://twitter.com/NWSReno/status/1516767775968174094/photo/2 Good for them, they need it as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
L
Wood Planer?
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 11:34 AM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 9:35 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 8:20 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 7:48 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
April Blizzard Predicted next week
Top
Bottom