What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Badlands mule deer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SDMF" data-source="post: 238926" data-attributes="member: 412"><p>It'd take me less than 30min to have a scope with lots of travel mounted and say 12-15 shots downrange in order to establish a 200yd zero and a good constant velocity then run a ballistic table. Assuming you have a precise zero and accurate velocity with relatively low ES/SD there's only 2 tricks to the above video of the 715yd pronghorn. 1. A good rest. 2. A really good read on the wind.</p><p></p><p>Pretty much every in-line ML on the market over the last 20-25yrs is faster with higher BC bullets than what factory loaded 45-70's are with smokeless.</p><p></p><p>Actually, I would prefer a good scope, but, wouldn't need it. A really good set of peep-sights would be almost as good though it'd take a bit longer (say 2-3hrs) to confirm sight settings at distance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SDMF, post: 238926, member: 412"] It'd take me less than 30min to have a scope with lots of travel mounted and say 12-15 shots downrange in order to establish a 200yd zero and a good constant velocity then run a ballistic table. Assuming you have a precise zero and accurate velocity with relatively low ES/SD there's only 2 tricks to the above video of the 715yd pronghorn. 1. A good rest. 2. A really good read on the wind. Pretty much every in-line ML on the market over the last 20-25yrs is faster with higher BC bullets than what factory loaded 45-70's are with smokeless. Actually, I would prefer a good scope, but, wouldn't need it. A really good set of peep-sights would be almost as good though it'd take a bit longer (say 2-3hrs) to confirm sight settings at distance. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: KDM
1 minute ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: KDM
3 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
6 minutes ago
T
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Tymurrey
53 minutes ago
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Yesterday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 12:18 AM
T
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Tikka280ai
Wednesday at 8:33 PM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Zogman
Wednesday at 7:21 AM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Tuesday at 7:22 PM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Rowdie
Tuesday at 12:58 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: johnr
Tuesday at 9:49 AM
S
BISON
Latest: savage270
Tuesday at 8:34 AM
Yoga
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 11:34 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Badlands mule deer
Top
Bottom