Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="lunkerslayer" data-source="post: 345313" data-attributes="member: 217">So by the definition of anti corporate farming the ONLY big difference I see why bill gates can't buy this land is becuase of the cluase that one must be related, if you read the story fireone posted one can see that the farmer in my opinion would be considered a corporate farmer on the grounds of how much land is being farmed. As far as land owners not wanting to allow hunting on thier land that has little to do with the argument of not wanting a billionaire to purchase land in North Dakota. Just look at how the land owners (ranchers) treat hunters in western part of this state. North Dakota Supreme Court has already caved to the original 1932 anti corporate law by allowing family members who are a 3rd cousin which one could say is bullshit becuase most likely thier not even blood related. If you don't know what that means I suggest you look it up</blockquote>

[QUOTE="lunkerslayer, post: 345313, member: 217"] So by the definition of anti corporate farming the ONLY big difference I see why bill gates can't buy this land is becuase of the cluase that one must be related, if you read the story fireone posted one can see that the farmer in my opinion would be considered a corporate farmer on the grounds of how much land is being farmed. As far as land owners not wanting to allow hunting on thier land that has little to do with the argument of not wanting a billionaire to purchase land in North Dakota. Just look at how the land owners (ranchers) treat hunters in western part of this state. North Dakota Supreme Court has already caved to the original 1932 anti corporate law by allowing family members who are a 3rd cousin which one could say is bullshit becuase most likely thier not even blood related. If you don't know what that means I suggest you look it up [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA