Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="lunkerslayer" data-source="post: 392300" data-attributes="member: 217">People have said that if the gnf increased the price of resident fees, North Dakota wouldn't need to rely so much on non resident fees.Another is the survey percentage of people who didn't  bother to fill our or go online, I would like the gnf to make it an incentive to sportsman to fill these out. As far as what that incentive would be that is something more discussion would be needed.Next the gnf should be informing the public on how they are able to determine with any accuracy to the number of fawns for each year class. Teach the public what's being used as far as the technology that goes into providing the data to make a scientific guess.I'm surprised the article didn't bring up the fact their was huge numbers of deer especially in the badlands that were caused by disease like cwd or EHD bluetongue.Does the gnf have a way for property owners that can call in or go online to report sightings of dead deer on their land? The news articles on wildlife in north dakota leave me asking more questions when they need to atleast post a hyper links for additional information on a specific statistic that is posted. They really do suck and that's becuase sportsman and landowners obviously are not interested in those kind of information.So the remedy to the prior years gun tag numbers and the gathered of fawns numbers need to allow for a special provision that allows the gnf to decrease numbers in bow tags for that season instead of waiting for the following year, well as we can all see that seems to be the consensus with gun tags for a upcoming deer season.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA