Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tim Sandstrom" data-source="post: 105918" data-attributes="member: 1108">People did testify to HB 1456.&nbsp; I myself did (through written testimony via email).&nbsp; I'm guessing I made a phone call or two as well.And as result, if you'll revisit the link to <a href="http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/64-2015/documents/15-0603-03004m.pdf" target="_blank">HB 1456</a> the people did speak.&nbsp; They forced amending of the bill to throw out transfering so called excess or no longer needed lands around Sakakawea and more specifically to the Oahe issue they tossed out transferring lands to &quot;appropriate persons.&quot;What's happening is the Governor being only &quot;encouraged&quot; to draft legislation to transfer has decided to be a hypocrite and throw away 30 years defending there are no excess acres and ensuring public lands and water access.&nbsp; How responsive are the federal legislators? I called Hoeven's office and got through.&nbsp; They all three support the bill (of which the public has not seen).&nbsp; Their response to me was &quot;they are doing what the people want.&quot;&nbsp; That's a blatant lie as I have just explained the will of the people was to amend the state bill to remove language transferring lands to private individuals.As to your comment on the Garrison Diversion Unit I'm not quite following?&nbsp; Here's the <a href="http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16021coll7/id/2346" target="_blank">Master Plan EA</a> that was agreed to in 2007.&nbsp; That is for Sakakawea.&nbsp; I'd have to do some big time reading for Oahe as I haven't finished the 800 plus pages for Sakakwea.&nbsp; But here is the page to get the project plans for all projects:<a href="http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Missions/DamandLakeProjects/ProjectMasterPlans.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Missions/DamandLakeProjects/ProjectMasterPlans.aspx</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tim Sandstrom, post: 105918, member: 1108"] People did testify to HB 1456. I myself did (through written testimony via email). I'm guessing I made a phone call or two as well. And as result, if you'll revisit the link to [B][URL="http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/64-2015/documents/15-0603-03004m.pdf"][COLOR=#0000ff]HB 1456[/COLOR][/URL][/B] the people did speak. They forced amending of the bill to throw out transfering so called excess or no longer needed lands around Sakakawea and more specifically to the Oahe issue they tossed out transferring lands to "appropriate persons." What's happening is the Governor being only "encouraged" to draft legislation to transfer has decided to be a hypocrite and throw away 30 years defending there are no excess acres and ensuring public lands and water access. How responsive are the federal legislators? I called Hoeven's office and got through. They all three support the bill (of which the public has not seen). Their response to me was "they are doing what the people want." That's a blatant lie as I have just explained the will of the people was to amend the state bill to remove language transferring lands to private individuals. As to your comment on the Garrison Diversion Unit I'm not quite following? Here's the [URL="http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16021coll7/id/2346"]Master Plan EA[/URL] that was agreed to in 2007. That is for Sakakawea. I'd have to do some big time reading for Oahe as I haven't finished the 800 plus pages for Sakakwea. But here is the page to get the project plans for all projects: [url]http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Missions/DamandLakeProjects/ProjectMasterPlans.aspx[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA