What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106025" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. </p><p></p><p>[h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in<em> Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc</em>. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions.</p><p>Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement:</p><p>“I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.”</p><p>Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion:</p><p><em>“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”</em></p><p><em>“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106025, member: 373"] I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. [h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in[I] Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc[/I]. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an [I]amicus curiae[/I] brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions. Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement: “I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.” Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion: [I]“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”[/I] [I]“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 12:32 AM
P
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 10:19 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:51 PM
Deer speeds.
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 9:05 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 2:39 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom