What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106025" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. </p><p></p><p>[h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in<em> Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc</em>. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions.</p><p>Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement:</p><p>“I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.”</p><p>Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion:</p><p><em>“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”</em></p><p><em>“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106025, member: 373"] I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. [h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in[I] Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc[/I]. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an [I]amicus curiae[/I] brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions. Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement: “I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.” Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion: [I]“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”[/I] [I]“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: Petras
29 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: SDMF
42 minutes ago
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 11:14 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 9:14 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
F
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 7:33 PM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 2:55 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 2:54 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Walleye Slayer
Yesterday at 10:09 AM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: JMF
Tuesday at 5:46 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom