What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106025" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. </p><p></p><p>[h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in<em> Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc</em>. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions.</p><p>Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement:</p><p>“I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.”</p><p>Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion:</p><p><em>“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”</em></p><p><em>“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106025, member: 373"] I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. [h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in[I] Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc[/I]. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an [I]amicus curiae[/I] brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions. Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement: “I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.” Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion: [I]“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”[/I] [I]“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: Maddog
Today at 2:58 AM
Poor Sportsmanship
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 1:11 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 12:32 AM
Sporting Clays
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 8:57 PM
New MN crappie Record
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 6:19 PM
Fishing videos
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 5:08 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 1:42 PM
Colorado Elk - Rifle
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 12:35 PM
Insanity in Oregon
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:47 AM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:12 PM
Elon's Damascus 1911 YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 9:49 PM
YOUTH TAG
Latest: Coyote Hunter
Friday at 9:14 PM
Battery draw…boat question
Latest: 1lessdog
Friday at 8:14 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: Rowdie
Friday at 3:52 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Bullsnake
Friday at 3:30 PM
L
Dont Forget
Latest: LBrandt
Friday at 12:23 PM
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: Allen
Friday at 11:29 AM
A win for Sportsmen
Latest: 1bigfokker
Friday at 10:00 AM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:14 PM
The Outfitters North Minot (WOW)
Latest: Duckslayer100
Thursday at 1:59 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Allen Gamble
Thursday at 11:03 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom