What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106025" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. </p><p></p><p>[h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in<em> Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc</em>. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions.</p><p>Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement:</p><p>“I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.”</p><p>Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion:</p><p><em>“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”</em></p><p><em>“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106025, member: 373"] I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. [h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in[I] Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc[/I]. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an [I]amicus curiae[/I] brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions. Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement: “I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.” Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion: [I]“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”[/I] [I]“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Mozambique Rock/Surf
Latest: Fritz the Cat
12 minutes ago
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: Rowdie
17 minutes ago
W
Walleye length limits on big 3
Latest: walleyewanker
34 minutes ago
Spring has sprung-
Latest: guywhofishes
35 minutes ago
ND Mushrooms
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Today at 9:17 PM
A
Ice angler cheats
Latest: Auggie
Today at 9:01 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: wslayer
Today at 5:56 PM
M
Walkin and thinkin
Latest: measure-it
Today at 11:31 AM
T
Sled auger mount
Latest: Travis wood outdoors
Today at 9:30 AM
Spring snows 26
Latest: Maddog
Today at 8:17 AM
ND Otters?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:00 PM
CO2 Climate Scam
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:00 PM
Gilly YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:40 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 12:53 PM
ND Senior Fishing lic Doubles
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 10:57 AM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 10:33 AM
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Yesterday at 9:51 AM
April Fool's day
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 8:53 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 2:10 AM
Butter Sauce Eggs YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:24 PM
Some bad ice
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:50 PM
Jerimiah Johnson YT 26min
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:46 PM
Learning to weld..er trying to
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:45 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom