What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106025" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. </p><p></p><p>[h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in<em> Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc</em>. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions.</p><p>Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement:</p><p>“I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.”</p><p>Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion:</p><p><em>“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”</em></p><p><em>“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106025, member: 373"] I find it odd how people that claim to be conservatives support Federal agencies that the courts are ruling now operate illegally and outside their limitations, controlling our public lands. [h=1]U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously against Federal Government in Water Case[/h]Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling against the federal government in[I] Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc[/I]. Earlier this year, Montana and 21 other states filed an [I]amicus curiae[/I] brief on behalf of the defendants challenging the federal government’s actions. Montana Attorney General Tim Fox released the following statement: “I am pleased to have helped secure this important victory for Montana. In its unanimous ruling against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the rights of those impacted by onerous federal water regulations to challenge them in court without having to first incur potentially ruinous civil penalties or permitting costs. This ruling is great news for Montanans, who rely so heavily upon agriculture, mining, and other productive enterprises. I hope this ruling also serves as a signal of what may come when our challenge to the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ regulation comes before the Supreme Court.” Key points from Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion: [I]“[T]he [Clean Water] Act’s reach is ‘notoriously unclear’ and the consequences to landowners even for inadvertent violations can be crushing.”[/I] [I]“The [Clean Water] Act, especially without the [Jurisdictional Determination] procedure were the Government permitted to foreclose it, continues to raisetroubling questions regarding the Government’s power to cast doubt on the full use and enjoyment of private property throughout the Nation.”[/I] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
P
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
41 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Kurtr
57 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 9:51 PM
Deer speeds.
Latest: risingsun
Today at 9:05 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 2:39 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Today at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Today at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Yesterday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom