Free Lunch

ale

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2025
Posts
40
Likes
45
Points
33
Ale, I know I wont change your mind and I appreciate your comments, I guess we can agree to disagree.
I believe we are slowly moving to the left in ND, as evidence is measure 2, and to make constitution changes harder to implement will slow the move to the left, in my opinion.
US Constitution history
Here is what I posted on a different thread, seems like we have multiple threads going about the same thing:

Measure 1 > a constitutional amendment proposed by North Dakota’s Republican-led legislature that would require a 60% vote threshold to pass future constitutional ballot measures. Chief sponsor is Speaker of the House Rep. Robin Weisz, R-Hurdsfield. Main opposition is the The Fairness Project, an progressive organization based in Washington, D.C. which has spent millions trying to defeat this measure, for many nefarious reasons.

Measure 2 > chief sponsor is Together for School Meals committee, headed Amy Jacobson. Jacobson is executive director of Prairie Action ND, a progressive policy group.
Measure 2 is a constitutional amendment that would provide free breakfast and lunch to K-12 students attending public schools and charter schools. The state would reimburse school districts for the cost of the meals and adjust the cost annually for inflation. This will cost an estimated $124.3 million to $134.3 million every two years, beginning in the 2027-29 budget cycle, according to analysis by the Department of Public Instruction. I believe this will be a low estimate, but since it will be part of our constitution it MUST and WILL be funded for all eternity. Repeal is historically and statistically unlikely.

As in both measures, it doesn't matter who sponsors or initiates a constitutional amendment, any amendment has to be approved by the voters. The legislature cannot pass an amendment on their own, they can only sponsor one and then get it on the ballot so we the people can decide. We the people decide every singe constitutional amendment.

That being said, in my opinion measure 2 is the exact reason we need measure 1. Free breakfast and lunch for kids has no business being part of our state constitution, and I believe the sponsors of measure 2 know it, and passage of measure 2 will lead to more ridiculous proposed amendments which could include free healthcare for all or select "groups", minimum wage increases, abortion rights, and even gun control rights. Its really just to easy to change our constitution.

I support a yes vote on measure 1, and a no vote on measure 2.

Either way, I hope everyone that is eligible to vote gets out and actually votes.
Absolutely, I never thought it was personal. And we do agree on measure 2 that’s a no. Though if it passes I guess the sky won’t fall and it’s hard to draw my line in the sand there when I see how many thousands I’m forced to donate to people who definitely don’t need it.

I don’t really think ND is moving to the left. I think what we have is a lot of people wearing the R brand who are doing a lot of greasy liberal shit and it’s getting tough to defend or support them.
 


SupressYourself

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Posts
2,299
Likes
1,516
Points
598
Location
Not where I'd like to be
Just remember: The kids of today will be caring for your ass in the retirement home. Hopefully their brains were fueled for their 16+ years of training and learning.

I suppose we could run our snowplows only half full of diesel all winter long, too. What could go wrong?
For the 84th time in this thread, no one has gone hungry under the current system. It does not happen.
And considering the downward trends in school discipline, accountability, teacher effectiveness, and so on, I think the amount of free nutrition given to an increasingly obese demographic is the least of our worries.
 


yakandfish

New member
Joined
Oct 8, 2026
Posts
18
Likes
8
Points
3
So North Dakota farmers want to be known for "feeding the world" but they don't want their tax money going to feeding their own citizens?

But they go tax free on the buildings they put up don't they?

Lot of big houses and building going up isn't there? How about ranchers? Do they get tax cuts on buildings?
 

yakandfish

New member
Joined
Oct 8, 2026
Posts
18
Likes
8
Points
3
yakandfish shows up a month ago just to post on this and a few other political threads........hmmmm something stinks and it smells like a fishyyak....

Well post some hunting fishing topics that are active and I'll respond to that. God you guys bitch about everything.

NDSportsman you sound like all the people I know around Mayville. 2B or not 2B?
 


yakandfish

New member
Joined
Oct 8, 2026
Posts
18
Likes
8
Points
3
You go first since you are so into the outdoors and all....

Yep, you gotta be from Traill county or Cass with that defensive reply.

I suppose no matter what interests I have I probably wouldn't hold a candle to you.

My kayak smells like fish. Old Town Sportsman. I have my boat transducer on it so I can map small bodies of water and then on the hardwater I have custom maps. Want to talk Red River float trips? Ever sat in a kayak for 10 hours straight? Can your belly handle that? Pick a topic buddy I will do my best.
 

Colt45

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
1,305
Likes
833
Points
373
So North Dakota farmers want to be known for "feeding the world" but they don't want their tax money going to feeding their own citizens?

But they go tax free on the buildings they put up don't they?

Lot of big houses and building going up isn't there? How about ranchers? Do they get tax cuts on buildings?
Not sure what your argument here is........... that we need to give all kids free breakfast and lunch because farmers and ranchers and such get tax cuts on buildings?
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 27
  • This month: 24
  • This month: 9
  • This month: 8
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 6
  • This month: 5
Top Bottom