What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Icepirate" data-source="post: 437515" data-attributes="member: 8079"><p><a href="https://gf.nd.gov/magazine/2022/oct/closer-look-at-the-blue-squares" target="_blank">https://gf.nd.gov/magazine/2022/oct/closer-look-at-the-blue-squares</a></p><p></p><p>not sure if the link will work, but here's a few interesting quotes for those that might not think the Utah lawsuit would affect North Dakota access that much. Here's a few stats that show what North Dakota has done with their state land.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“At statehood, North Dakota was granted about <strong>2.6 million</strong> acres from the federal government to be used primarily to generate money for public education,” said Jacob Lardy, land management specialist with the Department of Trust Lands.</p><p></p><p> “As a young state with vast expanses of prairie to be homesteaded, the need for funding was daunting and the North Dakota Land Department (precursor to the NDDTL) sold off school trust land to farmers and ranchers in the early 1900s to quickly fund education costs.</p><p></p><p>“By the 1970s the Land Board realized that continued land sales would forever deplete the trusts of their land holdings. At the time,<strong> 80% of the original congressional grant had been sold</strong>, a decision was made to restrict sales to small, difficult to manage tracts and to retain the remainder.” (I would argue on this one who determines what a small, difficult to manage tract is)</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>"Today</strong>, Lardy said, the Department of Trust Lands manages more than <strong>706,000</strong> surface acres across the state that are leased for agricultural purposes, with livestock grazing being the dominate land use."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The argument can be made that the land was sold a long time ago, which is true. But can anyone honestly say the current ND legislature wouldn't love to sell off some "small, difficult to manage tracts" to the highest bidder?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Icepirate, post: 437515, member: 8079"] [URL]https://gf.nd.gov/magazine/2022/oct/closer-look-at-the-blue-squares[/URL] not sure if the link will work, but here's a few interesting quotes for those that might not think the Utah lawsuit would affect North Dakota access that much. Here's a few stats that show what North Dakota has done with their state land. “At statehood, North Dakota was granted about [B]2.6 million[/B] acres from the federal government to be used primarily to generate money for public education,” said Jacob Lardy, land management specialist with the Department of Trust Lands. “As a young state with vast expanses of prairie to be homesteaded, the need for funding was daunting and the North Dakota Land Department (precursor to the NDDTL) sold off school trust land to farmers and ranchers in the early 1900s to quickly fund education costs. “By the 1970s the Land Board realized that continued land sales would forever deplete the trusts of their land holdings. At the time,[B] 80% of the original congressional grant had been sold[/B], a decision was made to restrict sales to small, difficult to manage tracts and to retain the remainder.” (I would argue on this one who determines what a small, difficult to manage tract is) [B]"Today[/B], Lardy said, the Department of Trust Lands manages more than [B]706,000[/B] surface acres across the state that are leased for agricultural purposes, with livestock grazing being the dominate land use." The argument can be made that the land was sold a long time ago, which is true. But can anyone honestly say the current ND legislature wouldn't love to sell off some "small, difficult to manage tracts" to the highest bidder? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Jiffy
31 minutes ago
N
Outdoor photo request
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 12:27 PM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Today at 12:17 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: wslayer
Today at 8:05 AM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:03 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 8:25 AM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Saturday at 9:08 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
Top
Bottom