What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slappy" data-source="post: 443511" data-attributes="member: 7608"><p>At first glance, I would tend to be in the camp opposed to public money being spent on private land without public access. That is a completely reasonable position for any fiscal conservative. </p><p></p><p>However, numerous things unique to this state make that position problematic for wildlife and hunters. Nodak has a low percentage of public land, a high percentage of crop and pasture land which is cut or grazed annually, extremely limited wooded areas, brutal climate, and a high percentage of resident hunters along with many NR's.</p><p></p><p>I would not agree with spending public or NDGF money stocking fish in a private lake with no public access. The difference there is fish can't walk to the public lake a quarter mile down the road.</p><p></p><p>I would like to see more done with the school trust lands but by law those are not managed for wildlife and hunting. Unfortunately, changing trust land use is a political minefield.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slappy, post: 443511, member: 7608"] At first glance, I would tend to be in the camp opposed to public money being spent on private land without public access. That is a completely reasonable position for any fiscal conservative. However, numerous things unique to this state make that position problematic for wildlife and hunters. Nodak has a low percentage of public land, a high percentage of crop and pasture land which is cut or grazed annually, extremely limited wooded areas, brutal climate, and a high percentage of resident hunters along with many NR's. I would not agree with spending public or NDGF money stocking fish in a private lake with no public access. The difference there is fish can't walk to the public lake a quarter mile down the road. I would like to see more done with the school trust lands but by law those are not managed for wildlife and hunting. Unfortunately, changing trust land use is a political minefield. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Allen
Today at 2:10 AM
J
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: jer79
Today at 1:14 AM
D
March 29
Latest: db-2
Today at 12:55 AM
Memes
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 12:17 AM
You’re never a nobody.
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 11:43 PM
Spring Turkey 2025
Latest: Freedom
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Let's See a BaseBall Game
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 5:49 PM
Destination Fishing Trip??
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 4:06 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 3:38 PM
Jerkbaits In a Pool
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 12:38 PM
Ready or not, here it comes.
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:28 AM
Spring Snows
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Thursday at 8:32 PM
W
Open water?
Latest: Wall-eyes
Thursday at 2:19 PM
R
The Birds.........
Latest: Retired Educator
Thursday at 1:52 PM
L
Handgun Choices
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 1:49 PM
1
Oahe, Smelt, thoughts?
Latest: 1850reata
Thursday at 9:44 AM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Wednesday at 7:15 PM
Possible ban ffs sota
Latest: Captainbrad
Wednesday at 7:35 AM
Same Dean Nelson?
Latest: Davey Crockett
Wednesday at 6:12 AM
M
Getting into Canada
Latest: measure-it
Tuesday at 6:19 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
Top
Bottom