What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slappy" data-source="post: 443511" data-attributes="member: 7608"><p>At first glance, I would tend to be in the camp opposed to public money being spent on private land without public access. That is a completely reasonable position for any fiscal conservative. </p><p></p><p>However, numerous things unique to this state make that position problematic for wildlife and hunters. Nodak has a low percentage of public land, a high percentage of crop and pasture land which is cut or grazed annually, extremely limited wooded areas, brutal climate, and a high percentage of resident hunters along with many NR's.</p><p></p><p>I would not agree with spending public or NDGF money stocking fish in a private lake with no public access. The difference there is fish can't walk to the public lake a quarter mile down the road.</p><p></p><p>I would like to see more done with the school trust lands but by law those are not managed for wildlife and hunting. Unfortunately, changing trust land use is a political minefield.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slappy, post: 443511, member: 7608"] At first glance, I would tend to be in the camp opposed to public money being spent on private land without public access. That is a completely reasonable position for any fiscal conservative. However, numerous things unique to this state make that position problematic for wildlife and hunters. Nodak has a low percentage of public land, a high percentage of crop and pasture land which is cut or grazed annually, extremely limited wooded areas, brutal climate, and a high percentage of resident hunters along with many NR's. I would not agree with spending public or NDGF money stocking fish in a private lake with no public access. The difference there is fish can't walk to the public lake a quarter mile down the road. I would like to see more done with the school trust lands but by law those are not managed for wildlife and hunting. Unfortunately, changing trust land use is a political minefield. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Outdoor adventure bucket lis
Latest: MSA
52 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 11:03 AM
Soybeans
Latest: D-Racer
Today at 11:00 AM
Any youth hunter stories?
Latest: jpv
Today at 10:15 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: risingsun
Today at 10:04 AM
Cocks
Latest: johnr
Today at 9:22 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:13 AM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 6:55 AM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 9:53 PM
Doorbell Cameras
Latest: Lou63
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
Pressure treat and alum
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Sale
Astrostart
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 10:26 AM
O
Sak
Van Hook 8-26-27-2026
Latest: OL Deadeye
Yesterday at 8:52 AM
Weekend project
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:19 AM
B
2013 Ice Castle 8x20
Latest: Bauer
Yesterday at 7:32 AM
N
RR
Red River 9-2-26
Latest: nanibis94
Yesterday at 3:35 AM
O
Ice house 250.00
Latest: otterwood
Sunday at 9:57 PM
"Back Strap" Diane YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:01 PM
H
RR
Red River 9-16-26
Latest: hankowl89
Sunday at 5:45 PM
Free
Scheels Recluse bow to young h
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 4:10 PM
T
Morning Doves
Latest: Traxion
Sunday at 3:21 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
Habitat Hunting Access Summit
Top
Bottom