What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slappy" data-source="post: 360143" data-attributes="member: 7608"><p>I agree with you it is dangerous and bad precedent, except we had to do exactly this to stop forced injections, vaccine passports, etc. There are many parallels between idiotic, un-American response to COVID and CWD.</p><p></p><p>Remember when NDGF required leaving deer carcasses (and the prions) in the field rather than allowing transport to dispose in a landfill? Many of us "non experts" correctly said that was bad policy. Kudos to NDGF for changing position on this, but they were wrong. The "experts" are not infallible.</p><p></p><p>What other recourse is there when "the experts" are wrong and it infringes on citizen rights? Would NDGF agree to public debate of the data and conclusions? The brief comment period they allow at advisory board meetings does not count. What about binding arbitration in a neutral forum?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slappy, post: 360143, member: 7608"] I agree with you it is dangerous and bad precedent, except we had to do exactly this to stop forced injections, vaccine passports, etc. There are many parallels between idiotic, un-American response to COVID and CWD. Remember when NDGF required leaving deer carcasses (and the prions) in the field rather than allowing transport to dispose in a landfill? Many of us "non experts" correctly said that was bad policy. Kudos to NDGF for changing position on this, but they were wrong. The "experts" are not infallible. What other recourse is there when "the experts" are wrong and it infringes on citizen rights? Would NDGF agree to public debate of the data and conclusions? The brief comment period they allow at advisory board meetings does not count. What about binding arbitration in a neutral forum? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
42 minutes ago
F
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 10:24 PM
Israel
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Yesterday at 12:57 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 12:01 AM
F
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: Fester
Friday at 8:41 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:27 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Friday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom