Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 369712" data-attributes="member: 8117">Just noticed this.. but I get it's not a place to change regulations. It's supposed to be a place of open input between landowners/sportsmen and the game and fish department. A couple months ago on here or hunt talk I said that moose populations are down (this is due to putting more miles on a pickup looking for wildlife then I want to admit) and sure enough.. our unit counts come out, and apps open up and guess what.. pops are down. I've definitely heard some head scratchers at advisory board meetings, but there's also been some good things brought up like running an invasive species check points on incoming boats like what Montana does and it wasn't even really discussed on 1 point. I think the advisory board meetings will be very civil. But I do think there will be some hard questions asked of the game and fish and people will be looking for answers (on 1151 type stuff and other topics). Hopefully the game and fish realizes that this bill was more than just baiting for some people.. like them not even being open to much discussion at their advisory board meetings like there is supposed to be as it is the one place people have the ability to sit and converse with them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wct12, post: 369712, member: 8117"] Just noticed this.. but I get it's not a place to change regulations. It's supposed to be a place of open input between landowners/sportsmen and the game and fish department. A couple months ago on here or hunt talk I said that moose populations are down (this is due to putting more miles on a pickup looking for wildlife then I want to admit) and sure enough.. our unit counts come out, and apps open up and guess what.. pops are down. I've definitely heard some head scratchers at advisory board meetings, but there's also been some good things brought up like running an invasive species check points on incoming boats like what Montana does and it wasn't even really discussed on 1 point. I think the advisory board meetings will be very civil. But I do think there will be some hard questions asked of the game and fish and people will be looking for answers (on 1151 type stuff and other topics). Hopefully the game and fish realizes that this bill was more than just baiting for some people.. like them not even being open to much discussion at their advisory board meetings like there is supposed to be as it is the one place people have the ability to sit and converse with them. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA