What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Judge strikes down CA ban on standard capacity mags
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bed Wetter" data-source="post: 254652" data-attributes="member: 428"><p>The hilarity of this request for stay from the. CA DOJ:</p><p></p><p>Judge strikes down law under 2nd and 5th amendments, stating that 1) standard capacity magazines meet the Heller standard of being “in common use” and 2) banning possession of mags deprives citizens of property without just compensation.</p><p></p><p>In the request for the stay, the CA DOJ/AG is requesting an IMMEDIATE stay because 1) tons of people are buying mags and they’re pouring into CA every hour and 2) if the appeal wins and the court ruling is overturned, all these people will have to destroy/turn in their mags and be out a bunch of money. So what the CA DOJ/AG are saying is, “you have to issue a stay because of you don’t, people will suffer in exactly the way you said they’d suffer in your ruling.” They’re actually making the plaintiff’s argument for them. ;:;rofl</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bed Wetter, post: 254652, member: 428"] The hilarity of this request for stay from the. CA DOJ: Judge strikes down law under 2nd and 5th amendments, stating that 1) standard capacity magazines meet the Heller standard of being “in common use” and 2) banning possession of mags deprives citizens of property without just compensation. In the request for the stay, the CA DOJ/AG is requesting an IMMEDIATE stay because 1) tons of people are buying mags and they’re pouring into CA every hour and 2) if the appeal wins and the court ruling is overturned, all these people will have to destroy/turn in their mags and be out a bunch of money. So what the CA DOJ/AG are saying is, “you have to issue a stay because of you don’t, people will suffer in exactly the way you said they’d suffer in your ruling.” They’re actually making the plaintiff’s argument for them. ;:;rofl [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Cat YT
Latest: svnmag
Today at 9:29 PM
P
Steak Time!
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Today at 9:06 PM
A
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Auggie
Today at 8:14 PM
Dog Help
Latest: Sluggo
Today at 7:40 PM
Happy Birthday Vollmer!
Latest: svnmag
Today at 7:30 PM
W
WALLEYE PLATE
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Today at 7:21 PM
Olympics?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 6:51 PM
B
ATF Backdoor Gun Registry
Latest: Browneye
Today at 6:37 PM
Clam vs. Eskimo vs. Otter
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 6:36 PM
Forage Minnow Dart
Latest: wslayer
Today at 4:36 PM
.357 Mag YT
Latest: SDMF
Today at 1:45 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 9:07 AM
35 Years Ago
Latest: Zogman
Today at 6:15 AM
R
GPS fencing for dogs
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
not with my luck.
Latest: lunkerslayer
Tuesday at 7:39 PM
Dice. Overpriced.
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 1:38 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 5:16 AM
158 grain .38 Special SWC
Latest: SDMF
Monday at 7:21 PM
Lake Darling
Latest: Allen
Monday at 1:39 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 10:22 AM
B
Fort Peck rescue
Latest: bigsky2
Monday at 9:04 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 12:06 PM
S
State of NDA
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 10:10 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Judge strikes down CA ban on standard capacity mags
Top
Bottom