What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Kyle Ritenhouse~
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ORCUS DEMENS" data-source="post: 333252" data-attributes="member: 1779"><p>While many of the members here are doing a victory dance for Kyle, the instructions from the judge per Wisconsin law were the reason he was not convicted of criminal charges. </p><p>Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder instructed the jury to consider whether Rittenhouse provoked the attacks. According to <a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48" target="_blank">Wisconsin law</a>, "a person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person."</p><p><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/how-wisconsin-s-self-defense-law-ensured-kyle-rittenhouse-s-acquittal/ar-AAQV2Kk?ocid=msedgntp" target="_blank">How Wisconsin's self-defense law ensured Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal (msn.com)</a></p><p>The way I read this is you can point a gun at a person, when they react to your threat you can shoot. That is one messed up law.</p><p>Conceal carry stresses pull the trigger only as a last resort.</p><p>Castle doctrine did not apply in this case as:</p><p>1. Rittenhouse was not defending his property.</p><p>2. The property owners did not request his help in defending the lot.</p><p>3. If he was scared, he should have retreated long before he confronted the first victim.</p><p></p><p>Apparently he wanted to be a law enforcement officer. Note no law enforcement officers discharged their weapons at this protest.</p><p>This young man is no hero. He is a foolish child who has not learned critical thinking skills. He most likely will never realize his aspiration of a career in law enforcement. </p><p>He was not convicted of criminal charges where the burden of proof is very high. Civil charges, which are likely to follow have a lower burden of proof. His fortunes will probably not be as successful there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ORCUS DEMENS, post: 333252, member: 1779"] While many of the members here are doing a victory dance for Kyle, the instructions from the judge per Wisconsin law were the reason he was not convicted of criminal charges. Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder instructed the jury to consider whether Rittenhouse provoked the attacks. According to [URL="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48"]Wisconsin law[/URL], "a person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person." [URL="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/how-wisconsin-s-self-defense-law-ensured-kyle-rittenhouse-s-acquittal/ar-AAQV2Kk?ocid=msedgntp"]How Wisconsin's self-defense law ensured Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal (msn.com)[/URL] The way I read this is you can point a gun at a person, when they react to your threat you can shoot. That is one messed up law. Conceal carry stresses pull the trigger only as a last resort. Castle doctrine did not apply in this case as: 1. Rittenhouse was not defending his property. 2. The property owners did not request his help in defending the lot. 3. If he was scared, he should have retreated long before he confronted the first victim. Apparently he wanted to be a law enforcement officer. Note no law enforcement officers discharged their weapons at this protest. This young man is no hero. He is a foolish child who has not learned critical thinking skills. He most likely will never realize his aspiration of a career in law enforcement. He was not convicted of criminal charges where the burden of proof is very high. Civil charges, which are likely to follow have a lower burden of proof. His fortunes will probably not be as successful there. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
F
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Fester
27 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: SDMF
40 minutes ago
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
51 minutes ago
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 12:15 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Today at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Today at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Yesterday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Kyle Ritenhouse~
Top
Bottom