What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Kyle Ritenhouse~
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ORCUS DEMENS" data-source="post: 333252" data-attributes="member: 1779"><p>While many of the members here are doing a victory dance for Kyle, the instructions from the judge per Wisconsin law were the reason he was not convicted of criminal charges. </p><p>Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder instructed the jury to consider whether Rittenhouse provoked the attacks. According to <a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48" target="_blank">Wisconsin law</a>, "a person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person."</p><p><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/how-wisconsin-s-self-defense-law-ensured-kyle-rittenhouse-s-acquittal/ar-AAQV2Kk?ocid=msedgntp" target="_blank">How Wisconsin's self-defense law ensured Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal (msn.com)</a></p><p>The way I read this is you can point a gun at a person, when they react to your threat you can shoot. That is one messed up law.</p><p>Conceal carry stresses pull the trigger only as a last resort.</p><p>Castle doctrine did not apply in this case as:</p><p>1. Rittenhouse was not defending his property.</p><p>2. The property owners did not request his help in defending the lot.</p><p>3. If he was scared, he should have retreated long before he confronted the first victim.</p><p></p><p>Apparently he wanted to be a law enforcement officer. Note no law enforcement officers discharged their weapons at this protest.</p><p>This young man is no hero. He is a foolish child who has not learned critical thinking skills. He most likely will never realize his aspiration of a career in law enforcement. </p><p>He was not convicted of criminal charges where the burden of proof is very high. Civil charges, which are likely to follow have a lower burden of proof. His fortunes will probably not be as successful there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ORCUS DEMENS, post: 333252, member: 1779"] While many of the members here are doing a victory dance for Kyle, the instructions from the judge per Wisconsin law were the reason he was not convicted of criminal charges. Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder instructed the jury to consider whether Rittenhouse provoked the attacks. According to [URL="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48"]Wisconsin law[/URL], "a person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person." [URL="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/how-wisconsin-s-self-defense-law-ensured-kyle-rittenhouse-s-acquittal/ar-AAQV2Kk?ocid=msedgntp"]How Wisconsin's self-defense law ensured Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal (msn.com)[/URL] The way I read this is you can point a gun at a person, when they react to your threat you can shoot. That is one messed up law. Conceal carry stresses pull the trigger only as a last resort. Castle doctrine did not apply in this case as: 1. Rittenhouse was not defending his property. 2. The property owners did not request his help in defending the lot. 3. If he was scared, he should have retreated long before he confronted the first victim. Apparently he wanted to be a law enforcement officer. Note no law enforcement officers discharged their weapons at this protest. This young man is no hero. He is a foolish child who has not learned critical thinking skills. He most likely will never realize his aspiration of a career in law enforcement. He was not convicted of criminal charges where the burden of proof is very high. Civil charges, which are likely to follow have a lower burden of proof. His fortunes will probably not be as successful there. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Lycanthrope
2 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:33 AM
R
Seekins rifles
Latest: Ruttin
Today at 9:11 AM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:04 AM
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 8:52 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Today at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 2:37 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Kyle Ritenhouse~
Top
Bottom