What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lycanthrope" data-source="post: 233494" data-attributes="member: 562"><p>There is evidence to suggest that the % of people driving under the influence of cannabis didnt increase significantly after legalization in states that have done it. People who were responsible enough to obey the current laws likely will not break them once legalization occurs, or risk driving while intoxicated. You may also find this interesting. Some data again suggesting that driving while high isnt nearly as dangerous as driving while drunk...</p><p></p><p>[h=4]RESULTS:[/h]The proportion of persons driving under the influence of alcohol is estimated at 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4-2.8) and under the influence of cannabis at 3.4% (2.9%-3.9%). Drivers under the influence of alcohol are 17.8 times (12.1-26.1) more likely to be responsible for a fatal accident, and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limit for alcohol is estimated at 27.7% (26.0%-29.4%). Drivers under the influence of cannabis multiply their risk of being responsible for causing a fatal accident by 1.65 (1.16-2.34), and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever drove under the influence of cannabis is estimated at 4.2% (3.7%-4.8%). An increased risk linked to opiate use has also been found to be significant, but with low prevalence, requiring caution in interpreting this finding. Other groups of narcotics have even lower prevalence, and the associated extra risks cannot be assessed.</p><p>[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h]Almost a decade separates the present study from a similar one previously conducted in France, and there have been numerous developments in the intervening years. Even so, the prevalence of drivers responsible for causing fatal accidents under the influence of alcohol or narcotics has stayed remarkably stable, as have the proportion of fatal accidents which could in theory be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limits. The overall number of deaths from traffic accidents has dropped sharply during this period, and the number of victims attributable to alcohol and/or cannabis declined proportionally. Alcohol remains the main problem in France. It is just as important to note that one in two drivers considered to be under the influence of cannabis was also under the influence of alcohol. With risks cumulating between the two, it is particularly important to point out the danger of consuming them together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lycanthrope, post: 233494, member: 562"] There is evidence to suggest that the % of people driving under the influence of cannabis didnt increase significantly after legalization in states that have done it. People who were responsible enough to obey the current laws likely will not break them once legalization occurs, or risk driving while intoxicated. You may also find this interesting. Some data again suggesting that driving while high isnt nearly as dangerous as driving while drunk... [h=4]RESULTS:[/h]The proportion of persons driving under the influence of alcohol is estimated at 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4-2.8) and under the influence of cannabis at 3.4% (2.9%-3.9%). Drivers under the influence of alcohol are 17.8 times (12.1-26.1) more likely to be responsible for a fatal accident, and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limit for alcohol is estimated at 27.7% (26.0%-29.4%). Drivers under the influence of cannabis multiply their risk of being responsible for causing a fatal accident by 1.65 (1.16-2.34), and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever drove under the influence of cannabis is estimated at 4.2% (3.7%-4.8%). An increased risk linked to opiate use has also been found to be significant, but with low prevalence, requiring caution in interpreting this finding. Other groups of narcotics have even lower prevalence, and the associated extra risks cannot be assessed. [h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h]Almost a decade separates the present study from a similar one previously conducted in France, and there have been numerous developments in the intervening years. Even so, the prevalence of drivers responsible for causing fatal accidents under the influence of alcohol or narcotics has stayed remarkably stable, as have the proportion of fatal accidents which could in theory be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limits. The overall number of deaths from traffic accidents has dropped sharply during this period, and the number of victims attributable to alcohol and/or cannabis declined proportionally. Alcohol remains the main problem in France. It is just as important to note that one in two drivers considered to be under the influence of cannabis was also under the influence of alcohol. With risks cumulating between the two, it is particularly important to point out the danger of consuming them together. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
N
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: NDbowman
A moment ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: 1lessdog
2 minutes ago
C
What happened to "htat was me"
Latest: camper
6 minutes ago
C
BISON
Latest: camper
Today at 1:16 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 1:13 PM
Yoga
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 1:11 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 12:43 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 11:17 AM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 8:37 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Maddog
Today at 7:14 AM
Can stevie see?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
R
wrong place
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 8:33 PM
P
Food porn
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 4:26 PM
Steroids Again?...
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 11:34 AM
Heat powered fans
Latest: wslayer
Friday at 6:19 PM
Buck Rubs/scrapes
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 4:31 PM
Atv winch rope
Latest: Jiffy
Thursday at 1:00 PM
Migration 25
Latest: Kurtr
Thursday at 10:56 AM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 7:12 AM
Thermostat dead zones
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 9:48 PM
Bad Drivers
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 4:23 PM
Good Luck...
Latest: tikkalover
Tuesday at 9:18 PM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Tuesday at 8:43 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
Top
Bottom