Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Muley14" data-source="post: 233549" data-attributes="member: 1560">After reading through the thread I have a couple comments1. I'm confused by how the legislature apparently screwed up medical marijuana but now those in favor of M3 are admitting there are problems with it but say the legislature can fix it. However it goes into effect in 30 days so the legislature doesn't have a chance to fix it in session. Imagine the uproar about the wasted tax dollars if there was a special session to fix it. For what it is worth I was told by a legislator who was strongly against medical, that they wanted to the measure to stand as written because it contradicted itself in so many different places it would collapse on itself.2. It seems like all the proponents of measure 3 are advocating that if passed, opioids would no longer be a problem. Then I hear that marijuana should be legalized just because it is so readily available now. These two statements seem counter intuitive to me, using these two pieces of information I don't know why we have a current opioid problem. I have always understood marijuana to be the first drug used - not the last.A couple other things I have been told:&nbsp;&nbsp; - There are no special taxes&nbsp;&nbsp; - There are no restrictions on when, where or how much it can be used or sold (other than under 21)&nbsp;&nbsp; - This repeals the medical marijuana - meaning it would be illegal for those under 21 for medical use&nbsp;&nbsp; - There are no provisions for actions under the influence</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Muley14, post: 233549, member: 1560"] After reading through the thread I have a couple comments 1. I'm confused by how the legislature apparently screwed up medical marijuana but now those in favor of M3 are admitting there are problems with it but say the legislature can fix it. However it goes into effect in 30 days so the legislature doesn't have a chance to fix it in session. Imagine the uproar about the wasted tax dollars if there was a special session to fix it. For what it is worth I was told by a legislator who was strongly against medical, that they wanted to the measure to stand as written because it contradicted itself in so many different places it would collapse on itself. 2. It seems like all the proponents of measure 3 are advocating that if passed, opioids would no longer be a problem. Then I hear that marijuana should be legalized just because it is so readily available now. These two statements seem counter intuitive to me, using these two pieces of information I don't know why we have a current opioid problem. I have always understood marijuana to be the first drug used - not the last. A couple other things I have been told: - There are no special taxes - There are no restrictions on when, where or how much it can be used or sold (other than under 21) - This repeals the medical marijuana - meaning it would be illegal for those under 21 for medical use - There are no provisions for actions under the influence [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA