What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND Constitutional measure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 487156" data-attributes="member: 337"><p>Constitutional Measure No. 1 (from Senate Concurrent Resolution 4007) is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the North Dakota June 9, 2026 primary election ballot. It requires a simple majority (50% + 1) to pass and would change the state constitution if approved.30</p><p></p><p></p><p>What It Does</p><p></p><p></p><p>It amends Article III, Section 9 (initiative petitions) and Article IV, Section 16 (legislative proposals) of the North Dakota Constitution to require that every constitutional amendment — whether citizen-initiated or referred by the Legislature — must address only a single subject.45</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For citizen initiatives: The Secretary of State reviews petitions and can reject them for circulation if they cover more than one subject (with potential input from the Attorney General).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For legislative referrals: The Legislature must limit its proposed amendments to one subject.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Goal (per supporters): Prevent “logrolling” (bundling unrelated issues), reduce voter confusion, and avoid “bait-and-switch” tactics where popular provisions hide controversial ones.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fiscal impact: None.45</li> </ul><p></p><p>How it appears on the ballot (official summary): “This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment be comprised of a single subject. … constitutional amendments would be limited to one subject. The Secretary of State shall not approve an initiative petition for circulation if the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. Additionally, the legislative assembly is required to limit proposed amendments to the constitution to one subject.”48</p><p></p><p></p><p>YES = Approve the single-subject requirement (changes the Constitution).</p><p>NO = Reject it (no change; multi-subject amendments remain possible).</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is narrower than the broader 2024 Measure 2 (which included signature increases and double-approval requirements and failed).46</p><p></p><p></p><p>Pros (Arguments in Favor)</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clarity for voters: Makes measures easier to understand and vote on without unrelated provisions complicating things.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Prevents deception: Stops “bait-and-switch” tactics (e.g., popular ideas like helping veterans paired with unrelated policy changes).46</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Common practice: Many states with initiative processes already use single-subject rules successfully; North Dakota’s Legislature already follows a similar rule for bills.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Focus and accountability: Forces sponsors to keep amendments targeted and transparent.46</li> </ul><p></p><p>Cons (Arguments Against)</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Potential barrier to initiatives: Could be used to block or complicate legitimate citizen-driven changes; enforcement by the Secretary of State/AG raises concerns about bias or overreach.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Unclear criteria: What counts as “one subject” may be subjective, adding bureaucratic hurdles and possible legal challenges.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Limits voter power: Critics (e.g., League of Women Voters, some Democrats) worry it could “handcuff” grassroots efforts, especially complex reforms like ethics commissions.46</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Timing concerns: Placed on the lower-turnout primary ballot rather than the general election.20</li> </ul><p></p><p>Note: This measure only affects constitutional amendments (not statutory initiated measures). A separate measure on the November 2026 ballot would change legislative term limits.5</p><p></p><p></p><p>For the full official guide, check the ND Secretary of State’s site or vote.nd.gov. Local discussions or forums in Fargo may provide more ND-specific perspectives as the election nears.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 487156, member: 337"] Constitutional Measure No. 1 (from Senate Concurrent Resolution 4007) is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the North Dakota June 9, 2026 primary election ballot. It requires a simple majority (50% + 1) to pass and would change the state constitution if approved.30 What It Does It amends Article III, Section 9 (initiative petitions) and Article IV, Section 16 (legislative proposals) of the North Dakota Constitution to require that every constitutional amendment — whether citizen-initiated or referred by the Legislature — must address only a single subject.45 [LIST] [*]For citizen initiatives: The Secretary of State reviews petitions and can reject them for circulation if they cover more than one subject (with potential input from the Attorney General). [*]For legislative referrals: The Legislature must limit its proposed amendments to one subject. [*]Goal (per supporters): Prevent “logrolling” (bundling unrelated issues), reduce voter confusion, and avoid “bait-and-switch” tactics where popular provisions hide controversial ones.20 [*]Fiscal impact: None.45 [/LIST] How it appears on the ballot (official summary): “This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment be comprised of a single subject. … constitutional amendments would be limited to one subject. The Secretary of State shall not approve an initiative petition for circulation if the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. Additionally, the legislative assembly is required to limit proposed amendments to the constitution to one subject.”48 YES = Approve the single-subject requirement (changes the Constitution). NO = Reject it (no change; multi-subject amendments remain possible). This is narrower than the broader 2024 Measure 2 (which included signature increases and double-approval requirements and failed).46 Pros (Arguments in Favor) [LIST] [*]Clarity for voters: Makes measures easier to understand and vote on without unrelated provisions complicating things.20 [*]Prevents deception: Stops “bait-and-switch” tactics (e.g., popular ideas like helping veterans paired with unrelated policy changes).46 [*]Common practice: Many states with initiative processes already use single-subject rules successfully; North Dakota’s Legislature already follows a similar rule for bills.20 [*]Focus and accountability: Forces sponsors to keep amendments targeted and transparent.46 [/LIST] Cons (Arguments Against) [LIST] [*]Potential barrier to initiatives: Could be used to block or complicate legitimate citizen-driven changes; enforcement by the Secretary of State/AG raises concerns about bias or overreach.20 [*]Unclear criteria: What counts as “one subject” may be subjective, adding bureaucratic hurdles and possible legal challenges.20 [*]Limits voter power: Critics (e.g., League of Women Voters, some Democrats) worry it could “handcuff” grassroots efforts, especially complex reforms like ethics commissions.46 [*]Timing concerns: Placed on the lower-turnout primary ballot rather than the general election.20 [/LIST] Note: This measure only affects constitutional amendments (not statutory initiated measures). A separate measure on the November 2026 ballot would change legislative term limits.5 For the full official guide, check the ND Secretary of State’s site or vote.nd.gov. Local discussions or forums in Fargo may provide more ND-specific perspectives as the election nears. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Oahe 26
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 5:28 PM
Lawnmower starting issue
Latest: Maddog
Today at 4:30 PM
T
OFFICIAL 2026 Deer Gun Lottery
Latest: Tymurrey
Today at 12:15 PM
T
Chorizo
Latest: thriller1
Today at 10:05 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:59 PM
RR
Red River 6-18-26
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
The End of New Rounds?...(yt)
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:11 PM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 5:56 PM
Long sleeve hot weather shirts
Latest: MSA
Yesterday at 3:02 PM
Looking for a German Shepard
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 1:56 PM
Galena, KS
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 12:47 PM
Not just pheasants in Pembina
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 10:03 AM
T
World Cup 2026
Latest: Traxion
Wednesday at 8:31 PM
Zebra Mussels Discovered in Twin Lakes
Latest: risingsun
Wednesday at 6:08 PM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: tikkalover
Wednesday at 1:09 PM
Ozempic Face
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 12:26 PM
O
Tour Level Gold - Sak
Latest: OL Deadeye
Wednesday at 8:03 AM
O
Early Fawns
Latest: OL Deadeye
Wednesday at 7:58 AM
Food porn
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:34 PM
I Like Fun Facts
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 9:08 PM
Boat Title or Registration???
Latest: Allen
Tuesday at 2:09 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND Constitutional measure
Top
Bottom