What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND Constitutional measure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 487156" data-attributes="member: 337"><p>Constitutional Measure No. 1 (from Senate Concurrent Resolution 4007) is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the North Dakota June 9, 2026 primary election ballot. It requires a simple majority (50% + 1) to pass and would change the state constitution if approved.30</p><p></p><p></p><p>What It Does</p><p></p><p></p><p>It amends Article III, Section 9 (initiative petitions) and Article IV, Section 16 (legislative proposals) of the North Dakota Constitution to require that every constitutional amendment — whether citizen-initiated or referred by the Legislature — must address only a single subject.45</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For citizen initiatives: The Secretary of State reviews petitions and can reject them for circulation if they cover more than one subject (with potential input from the Attorney General).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For legislative referrals: The Legislature must limit its proposed amendments to one subject.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Goal (per supporters): Prevent “logrolling” (bundling unrelated issues), reduce voter confusion, and avoid “bait-and-switch” tactics where popular provisions hide controversial ones.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fiscal impact: None.45</li> </ul><p></p><p>How it appears on the ballot (official summary): “This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment be comprised of a single subject. … constitutional amendments would be limited to one subject. The Secretary of State shall not approve an initiative petition for circulation if the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. Additionally, the legislative assembly is required to limit proposed amendments to the constitution to one subject.”48</p><p></p><p></p><p>YES = Approve the single-subject requirement (changes the Constitution).</p><p>NO = Reject it (no change; multi-subject amendments remain possible).</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is narrower than the broader 2024 Measure 2 (which included signature increases and double-approval requirements and failed).46</p><p></p><p></p><p>Pros (Arguments in Favor)</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clarity for voters: Makes measures easier to understand and vote on without unrelated provisions complicating things.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Prevents deception: Stops “bait-and-switch” tactics (e.g., popular ideas like helping veterans paired with unrelated policy changes).46</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Common practice: Many states with initiative processes already use single-subject rules successfully; North Dakota’s Legislature already follows a similar rule for bills.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Focus and accountability: Forces sponsors to keep amendments targeted and transparent.46</li> </ul><p></p><p>Cons (Arguments Against)</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Potential barrier to initiatives: Could be used to block or complicate legitimate citizen-driven changes; enforcement by the Secretary of State/AG raises concerns about bias or overreach.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Unclear criteria: What counts as “one subject” may be subjective, adding bureaucratic hurdles and possible legal challenges.20</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Limits voter power: Critics (e.g., League of Women Voters, some Democrats) worry it could “handcuff” grassroots efforts, especially complex reforms like ethics commissions.46</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Timing concerns: Placed on the lower-turnout primary ballot rather than the general election.20</li> </ul><p></p><p>Note: This measure only affects constitutional amendments (not statutory initiated measures). A separate measure on the November 2026 ballot would change legislative term limits.5</p><p></p><p></p><p>For the full official guide, check the ND Secretary of State’s site or vote.nd.gov. Local discussions or forums in Fargo may provide more ND-specific perspectives as the election nears.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 487156, member: 337"] Constitutional Measure No. 1 (from Senate Concurrent Resolution 4007) is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the North Dakota June 9, 2026 primary election ballot. It requires a simple majority (50% + 1) to pass and would change the state constitution if approved.30 What It Does It amends Article III, Section 9 (initiative petitions) and Article IV, Section 16 (legislative proposals) of the North Dakota Constitution to require that every constitutional amendment — whether citizen-initiated or referred by the Legislature — must address only a single subject.45 [LIST] [*]For citizen initiatives: The Secretary of State reviews petitions and can reject them for circulation if they cover more than one subject (with potential input from the Attorney General). [*]For legislative referrals: The Legislature must limit its proposed amendments to one subject. [*]Goal (per supporters): Prevent “logrolling” (bundling unrelated issues), reduce voter confusion, and avoid “bait-and-switch” tactics where popular provisions hide controversial ones.20 [*]Fiscal impact: None.45 [/LIST] How it appears on the ballot (official summary): “This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment be comprised of a single subject. … constitutional amendments would be limited to one subject. The Secretary of State shall not approve an initiative petition for circulation if the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. Additionally, the legislative assembly is required to limit proposed amendments to the constitution to one subject.”48 YES = Approve the single-subject requirement (changes the Constitution). NO = Reject it (no change; multi-subject amendments remain possible). This is narrower than the broader 2024 Measure 2 (which included signature increases and double-approval requirements and failed).46 Pros (Arguments in Favor) [LIST] [*]Clarity for voters: Makes measures easier to understand and vote on without unrelated provisions complicating things.20 [*]Prevents deception: Stops “bait-and-switch” tactics (e.g., popular ideas like helping veterans paired with unrelated policy changes).46 [*]Common practice: Many states with initiative processes already use single-subject rules successfully; North Dakota’s Legislature already follows a similar rule for bills.20 [*]Focus and accountability: Forces sponsors to keep amendments targeted and transparent.46 [/LIST] Cons (Arguments Against) [LIST] [*]Potential barrier to initiatives: Could be used to block or complicate legitimate citizen-driven changes; enforcement by the Secretary of State/AG raises concerns about bias or overreach.20 [*]Unclear criteria: What counts as “one subject” may be subjective, adding bureaucratic hurdles and possible legal challenges.20 [*]Limits voter power: Critics (e.g., League of Women Voters, some Democrats) worry it could “handcuff” grassroots efforts, especially complex reforms like ethics commissions.46 [*]Timing concerns: Placed on the lower-turnout primary ballot rather than the general election.20 [/LIST] Note: This measure only affects constitutional amendments (not statutory initiated measures). A separate measure on the November 2026 ballot would change legislative term limits.5 For the full official guide, check the ND Secretary of State’s site or vote.nd.gov. Local discussions or forums in Fargo may provide more ND-specific perspectives as the election nears. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
ND Constitutional measure
Latest: Duckslayer100
14 minutes ago
Shorthairs
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 7:07 AM
Generation X
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 5:54 AM
Vinegar/Sand?!! YT AI
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
M
The Geraldo vault, but better!
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 3:10 PM
Yukon Clam flip over ice shack
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:10 PM
Sporting Clays
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 12:47 PM
V
36v minnkota ulterra 60"
Latest: v193
Yesterday at 11:17 AM
No Bag Limit
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 10:31 AM
Voltiq Reel Hype
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 10:03 AM
Deep fission reactors
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:04 AM
Diablo Sandwich
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 8:39 PM
Does The .22 Bounce in Skulls?
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 7:29 PM
B
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Bob
Tuesday at 5:33 PM
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: lunkerslayer
Tuesday at 6:10 AM
Fred Bear videos
Latest: lunkerslayer
Monday at 11:22 PM
O
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Monday at 10:16 PM
Mille Lacs lake
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 8:22 PM
Graph Help!
Latest: sweeney
Monday at 5:15 PM
61.26 lbs, 1 day on Fort Peck
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 12:29 PM
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Monday at 10:35 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND Constitutional measure
Top
Bottom