What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 207359" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>You're correct Gabe. These orgs got together with the govt. and CHANGED the CRP program which is why I got out. If a landowner decides to participate now, they must follow the rules of the contract. Pretty simple. It doesn't matter that haying or grazing is good for the land, it wasn't allowed by the rules of the contract the landowners signed. Let's start holding landowners accountable for the decisions they make concerning their land shall we. Nobody tells me what to do on my land, but then again, I'm NOT in any programs which would require me to follow any rules. Who tells you what to do on your land?? I bet if anyone has the ability, it's because you signed on the dotted line. As far as the WOTUS goes, I just copied this from Google and it seems that both the ACOE and the EPA are backing the truck up on that deal due to challenges. I read the text and it basically stays the WOTUS until the ACOE and EPA can prove several steps concerning a water body before they can even attempt to implement this. So Thank You for your suggestion to learn about the WOTUS, but you might want to take your own advice. Mkay.</p><p></p><p> <span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">Feb 6, 2018 - </span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">EPA and Army Move to Rescind 2015 "</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>Waters of the U.S.</strong></span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">" Definition. The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Army (the agencies) are proposing a rule to rescind the Clean</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>Water</strong></span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"> Rule and re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining "</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>waters of the United </strong></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 207359, member: 314"] You're correct Gabe. These orgs got together with the govt. and CHANGED the CRP program which is why I got out. If a landowner decides to participate now, they must follow the rules of the contract. Pretty simple. It doesn't matter that haying or grazing is good for the land, it wasn't allowed by the rules of the contract the landowners signed. Let's start holding landowners accountable for the decisions they make concerning their land shall we. Nobody tells me what to do on my land, but then again, I'm NOT in any programs which would require me to follow any rules. Who tells you what to do on your land?? I bet if anyone has the ability, it's because you signed on the dotted line. As far as the WOTUS goes, I just copied this from Google and it seems that both the ACOE and the EPA are backing the truck up on that deal due to challenges. I read the text and it basically stays the WOTUS until the ACOE and EPA can prove several steps concerning a water body before they can even attempt to implement this. So Thank You for your suggestion to learn about the WOTUS, but you might want to take your own advice. Mkay. [COLOR=#808080][FONT=Roboto]Feb 6, 2018 - [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto]EPA and Army Move to Rescind 2015 "[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]Waters of the U.S.[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto]" Definition. The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Army (the agencies) are proposing a rule to rescind the Clean[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]Water[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto] Rule and re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining "[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]waters of the United [/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
Today at 12:29 AM
F
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 10:24 PM
Israel
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Yesterday at 12:57 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 12:01 AM
F
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: Fester
Friday at 8:41 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:27 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Friday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
Top
Bottom