Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 207359" data-attributes="member: 314">You're correct Gabe.  These orgs got together with the govt. and CHANGED the CRP program which is why I got out.  If a landowner decides to participate now, they must follow the rules of the contract.  Pretty simple.  It doesn't matter that haying or grazing is good for the land, it wasn't allowed by the rules of the contract the landowners signed.  Let's start holding landowners accountable for the decisions they make concerning their land shall we.  Nobody tells me what to do on my land, but then again, I'm NOT in any programs which would require me to follow any rules.  Who tells you what to do on your land??  I bet if anyone has the ability, it's because you signed on the dotted line.  As far as the WOTUS goes, I just copied this from Google and it seems that both the ACOE and the EPA are backing the truck up on that deal due to challenges.  I read the text and it basically stays the WOTUS until the ACOE and EPA can prove several steps concerning a water body before they can even attempt to implement this.  So Thank You for your suggestion to learn about the WOTUS, but you might want to take your own advice.  Mkay.   Feb 6, 2018 - EPA and Army Move to Rescind 2015 "Waters of the U.S." Definition. The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Army (the agencies) are proposing a rule to rescind the CleanWater Rule and re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining "waters of the United </blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA