What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 207359" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>You're correct Gabe. These orgs got together with the govt. and CHANGED the CRP program which is why I got out. If a landowner decides to participate now, they must follow the rules of the contract. Pretty simple. It doesn't matter that haying or grazing is good for the land, it wasn't allowed by the rules of the contract the landowners signed. Let's start holding landowners accountable for the decisions they make concerning their land shall we. Nobody tells me what to do on my land, but then again, I'm NOT in any programs which would require me to follow any rules. Who tells you what to do on your land?? I bet if anyone has the ability, it's because you signed on the dotted line. As far as the WOTUS goes, I just copied this from Google and it seems that both the ACOE and the EPA are backing the truck up on that deal due to challenges. I read the text and it basically stays the WOTUS until the ACOE and EPA can prove several steps concerning a water body before they can even attempt to implement this. So Thank You for your suggestion to learn about the WOTUS, but you might want to take your own advice. Mkay.</p><p></p><p> <span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">Feb 6, 2018 - </span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">EPA and Army Move to Rescind 2015 "</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>Waters of the U.S.</strong></span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'">" Definition. The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Army (the agencies) are proposing a rule to rescind the Clean</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>Water</strong></span></span><span style="color: #545454"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"> Rule and re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining "</span></span><span style="color: #6A6A6A"><span style="font-family: 'Roboto'"><strong>waters of the United </strong></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 207359, member: 314"] You're correct Gabe. These orgs got together with the govt. and CHANGED the CRP program which is why I got out. If a landowner decides to participate now, they must follow the rules of the contract. Pretty simple. It doesn't matter that haying or grazing is good for the land, it wasn't allowed by the rules of the contract the landowners signed. Let's start holding landowners accountable for the decisions they make concerning their land shall we. Nobody tells me what to do on my land, but then again, I'm NOT in any programs which would require me to follow any rules. Who tells you what to do on your land?? I bet if anyone has the ability, it's because you signed on the dotted line. As far as the WOTUS goes, I just copied this from Google and it seems that both the ACOE and the EPA are backing the truck up on that deal due to challenges. I read the text and it basically stays the WOTUS until the ACOE and EPA can prove several steps concerning a water body before they can even attempt to implement this. So Thank You for your suggestion to learn about the WOTUS, but you might want to take your own advice. Mkay. [COLOR=#808080][FONT=Roboto]Feb 6, 2018 - [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto]EPA and Army Move to Rescind 2015 "[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]Waters of the U.S.[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto]" Definition. The Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Army (the agencies) are proposing a rule to rescind the Clean[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]Water[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#545454][FONT=Roboto] Rule and re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining "[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#6A6A6A][FONT=Roboto][B]waters of the United [/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
T
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Traxion
4 minutes ago
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 12:15 PM
Crazy Fingers
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 12:11 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 11:54 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Today at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Today at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Yesterday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
Top
Bottom