What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 207367" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>KDM I am providing just a few links of what actually IS happening that shows one does NOT have the ultimate authority over what is done on their private property as you seem ot claim. </p><p></p><p><strong>WOTUS is only as far gone as the next Democratic Congress and president as those groups that SUE and SETTLE to get their agendas accomplished are still well funded <span style="font-size: 15px">and in some cases supported even by sportsmen</span> and THAT is the "point"</strong> </p><p></p><p>indeed the land owner decides whether or not to sign up for CRP but these orgs DO in fact play a LARGE role in that choice when they impact those programs with their sue and settle actions. And what I am trying to tell you that in ranching country producers were still interested in CRP had it not been for these sue and settle orgs and their efforts. </p><p></p><p>If you want to actually have a discussion about possible solutions to habitat in ND you need to understand and accept these wildlife and in some instances sportsmen orgs DO in FACT play a role in what the land owner chooses to do. Ignoring the impact groups like DU and others have in working with landowners to develop habitat is foolish and counter productive if in fact your goal is to increase habitat. </p><p></p><p>If you don;t think it is, explain why DU's M 5 lost so badly.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I am not pasting examples of people pissed becasue their taxes go to Obama phones, I am giving examples of govt agencies and regulations that restrict, regulate and control what you can do with private property even if you are not involved in any govt program at all. </p><p></p><p>I am trying ot point out these restrictions are often the result of wildlife/sportsmen/environmental orgs sue and settle policies. </p><p></p><p>Who said conservation programs should cease to exist? Why would you make such an assinine claim? </p><p></p><p>What you seem not able to understand is what is being said is that if we want conservation programs that actually work (you have to get people enrolled for them to work) the efforts of orgs like the NWF and many others can not be ignored. </p><p></p><p>Partner with or support the wrong wildlife/sportsmen orgs and you simply will not get support from those whose lands you want habitat on. </p><p></p><p>If you don;t think so pull into farmers yards, tell them you are from DU and want to partner with them to save their wetlands. </p><p></p><p>Pull into a ranchers yard and tell them you are from the Sierra Club and want to partner with them to save their grasslands. </p><p></p><p>Jeesh I really didn;t think that was going ot be such a hard concept to grasp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 207367, member: 373"] KDM I am providing just a few links of what actually IS happening that shows one does NOT have the ultimate authority over what is done on their private property as you seem ot claim. [B]WOTUS is only as far gone as the next Democratic Congress and president as those groups that SUE and SETTLE to get their agendas accomplished are still well funded [SIZE=4]and in some cases supported even by sportsmen[/SIZE] and THAT is the "point"[/B] indeed the land owner decides whether or not to sign up for CRP but these orgs DO in fact play a LARGE role in that choice when they impact those programs with their sue and settle actions. And what I am trying to tell you that in ranching country producers were still interested in CRP had it not been for these sue and settle orgs and their efforts. If you want to actually have a discussion about possible solutions to habitat in ND you need to understand and accept these wildlife and in some instances sportsmen orgs DO in FACT play a role in what the land owner chooses to do. Ignoring the impact groups like DU and others have in working with landowners to develop habitat is foolish and counter productive if in fact your goal is to increase habitat. If you don;t think it is, explain why DU's M 5 lost so badly. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I am not pasting examples of people pissed becasue their taxes go to Obama phones, I am giving examples of govt agencies and regulations that restrict, regulate and control what you can do with private property even if you are not involved in any govt program at all. I am trying ot point out these restrictions are often the result of wildlife/sportsmen/environmental orgs sue and settle policies. Who said conservation programs should cease to exist? Why would you make such an assinine claim? What you seem not able to understand is what is being said is that if we want conservation programs that actually work (you have to get people enrolled for them to work) the efforts of orgs like the NWF and many others can not be ignored. Partner with or support the wrong wildlife/sportsmen orgs and you simply will not get support from those whose lands you want habitat on. If you don;t think so pull into farmers yards, tell them you are from DU and want to partner with them to save their wetlands. Pull into a ranchers yard and tell them you are from the Sierra Club and want to partner with them to save their grasslands. Jeesh I really didn;t think that was going ot be such a hard concept to grasp. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
22 minutes ago
N
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: NDbowman
53 minutes ago
P
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: Pheasant 54
59 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 8:14 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: 3Roosters
Today at 6:21 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: tikkalover
Today at 6:21 PM
F 150 Owners
Latest: wslayer
Today at 2:34 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Duckslayer100
Today at 11:59 AM
S
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: snow2
Today at 11:00 AM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Today at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 10:33 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 8:28 AM
Drone defense!?!
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 7:59 AM
Tire ? number 641
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 7:20 AM
Spray foam on steel??
Latest: grantfurness
Tuesday at 8:56 PM
Weeeeeeee!!!!!!!!
Latest: risingsun
Tuesday at 6:37 PM
Sak
West End
Latest: cooter00
Tuesday at 1:30 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: ktm450
Tuesday at 9:12 AM
A
Turkey Time
Latest: AR-15
Tuesday at 5:19 AM
2026 SCI RRV Banquet
Latest: Callem'In
Monday at 5:29 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 12:22 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Monday at 6:14 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
Pheasant Politics
Top
Bottom