Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Colt45" data-source="post: 499448" data-attributes="member: 1693">You assume all eligible voters actually vote. In the last election, only 43% of eligible voters actually voted, and historically the voter turnout is higher when its a presidential election. So I suspect this election will be below the 43% turnout, which means maybe 20% can ram a constitutional change through and mandate more &quot;free&quot; stuff.&nbsp; I don't think you understand the measure wally. It only applies to constitutional ballot measures, not statutory ballot measures that don't alter the constitution.It should be hard to change the constitution, not easy.Vote Yes on measure one.PS: where is all the funding coming from to push the free lunch measure 2? Measure 2 is a constitutional change and if passed that will be MANDATORY spending for all eternity.What's next, free healthcare for all? Taxpayer funded abortions?Its a very slippery slope</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Colt45, post: 499448, member: 1693"] You assume all eligible voters actually vote. In the last election, only 43% of eligible voters actually voted, and historically the voter turnout is higher when its a presidential election. So I suspect this election will be below the 43% turnout, which means maybe 20% can ram a constitutional change through and mandate more "free" stuff. I don't think you understand the measure wally. It only applies to constitutional ballot measures, not statutory ballot measures that don't alter the constitution. It should be hard to change the constitution, not easy. Vote Yes on measure one. PS: where is all the funding coming from to push the free lunch measure 2? Measure 2 is a constitutional change and if passed that will be MANDATORY spending for all eternity. What's next, free healthcare for all? Taxpayer funded abortions? Its a very slippery slope [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA