onpoint!
Established Member
Saw the notice for Public Hearing about the proposals for laying pipelines under Lake Sak. I understand there are at least a couple of versions, and that there has been virtually ZERO comments opposing any plan. i believe one approach is to "water-trench" a depression in the floor and lay pipe into it, then cover that with silt. If that's truly the case, who'd think that's a good idea? Even if you'd bury the pipeline, is anyone on here confident we wouldn't lose our great fishery due to leaks/breaks over time??
Maybe I'm out-of-touch; maybe we should trust the oil companies to lay a leak-proof pipeline under this amazing waterway; maybe a little spill would be caught and the remedy effective; maybe the other spills we've read about have been hyped by GreenPeace.
I'm not anti-oil. But it seems the state has sold out to oil production at any cost. Hope to see and hear some of you sportsmen at the Monday meeting in Garrison 3/28 at 5:30 (Soup/sandwiches provided, meeting starts at 6:00 with open mic expected).
Maybe I'm out-of-touch; maybe we should trust the oil companies to lay a leak-proof pipeline under this amazing waterway; maybe a little spill would be caught and the remedy effective; maybe the other spills we've read about have been hyped by GreenPeace.
I'm not anti-oil. But it seems the state has sold out to oil production at any cost. Hope to see and hear some of you sportsmen at the Monday meeting in Garrison 3/28 at 5:30 (Soup/sandwiches provided, meeting starts at 6:00 with open mic expected).