Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fritz the Cat" data-source="post: 258482" data-attributes="member: 605">What is being discussed is two ideologies. On the one hand someone wants to purchase the land to grow their business, work the land or use the land to raise a family. Every one of us needs that. On the flip side some folks want land set aside for hunting. Property owned in common by everyone. A third option, there is some land for sale by M&W Hunting Club or 640 acres at auction on Feb. 10th. It may fetch $1 million. Using a commune theory it may take 100 sportsmen to afford it. Form a club and each chip in $10,000. Now the work begins. Trees to plant and weeding them. Food plots and planting. Spraying weeds. Create a hunting mecca. We all know how this works. 5% of the 100 owners do all the work and on opening day the other 95% show up to harvest. That is why the commune....ism system doesn't work. So everyone moves on to letting the non-profits buy. Same problem. When land is owned in common, who is going to plant the food plots, plant and weed the trees, spray the Canada Thistle, etc. for the wildlife?bravo thinks non-profits purchasing land should be brought back to the table. Instead of taking private land out of production, how about putting existing public land into production? Or wildlife production? Do something with it. Remember though that it is owned in common and some preservationists are going to fight that they want it in a natural state or no trace of hunting conservationists.The whole idea of allowing non-profits purchasing land was rejected by the voters during the clean water air ballot measure recently. </blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA