Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fly Carpin" data-source="post: 153032" data-attributes="member: 1187">Or maybe it's indicative of this thread being about the specific topic of selling Federal lands to the states. That's what we're discussing here. You posted, and I quote, "Skibbys Bottom IN A DIFFERENT THREAD alluded to..." Also, "just want their little deal of hunting"? I'm afraid of what the repercussions of this may be, but I need to say it. As others have said to you time and time again, this is a hunting and fishing website. This thread in particular is a discussion among a group of like minded individuals concerning their worries about what the states would do to their federal lands which they use to hunt. Yes federal lands are multiple use. No one is debating that. One of those uses is recreation. That is how the majority of people on this site use federal lands. By banging your multiple use drum every time someone mentions federal land, what are you hoping to achieve? Has anyone ever said they disagree with multiple use on federal land? I'd guess no. What happens is you derail a thread with a somewhat related yet off-topic question, and then say "answer the question. It's a simple question" 900 times in a row. Here's my theory. No one responds to your question about fixing grazing allotments or logging on fed lands because they honestly don't know the answer. I know I don't. We're hunters. We're fisherman. We know what we know. And what most of us believe, including the people that spoke up on this bill, is that federal lands should stay federal. The people have spoken. The gentleman from Utah withdrew his bill. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to the B. Haugland room at the Capitol to voice my opinion as a non-landowning hunter in North Dakota. Have a good day and stay warm up there gst</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA