Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 276657" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>The first two sentences of your post is how incrementalism works and is just what these control mongers want to hear.&nbsp; The third sentence is why you might want to rethink your first two sentences.&nbsp; Letting things happen without reason leads to VERY BAD POLICY.&nbsp; The forth sentence needs to be clarified with data and quantified.&nbsp; The last time this was discussed the data from ND showed all of these factors to be in ridiculously small amounts, which then begs the question of &quot;Why change policy that will dramatically affect the many when there are so few that have issues?&quot;&nbsp; The fifth sentence is just a rant about unrelated issues, while the sixth sentence is something I wholeheartedly agree with.&nbsp; However, I'll ask you, &quot;How will making all private land posted, INCREASE, the amount of land open to the public to hunt?&quot;&nbsp; Your first two sentences directly counter your desire to have more land open to the public.&nbsp; I don't quite understand this.&nbsp; Your last sentence is another rant I surmise comes from personal experiences, which again I don't quite understand how this will help INCREASE land open to the public.&nbsp; The &quot;No Trespass Bill&quot; in all it's forms is BAD POLICY based on emotion that you, yourself have stated will change nothing.&nbsp; I for one will keep asking for evidence, demanding data, dismissing non scientific emotional outcry, and FIGHT this idiocy to the end.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="KDM, post: 276657, member: 314"] The first two sentences of your post is how incrementalism works and is just what these control mongers want to hear. The third sentence is why you might want to rethink your first two sentences. Letting things happen without reason leads to VERY BAD POLICY. The forth sentence needs to be clarified with data and quantified. The last time this was discussed the data from ND showed all of these factors to be in ridiculously small amounts, which then begs the question of "Why change policy that will dramatically affect the many when there are so few that have issues?" The fifth sentence is just a rant about unrelated issues, while the sixth sentence is something I wholeheartedly agree with. However, I'll ask you, "How will making all private land posted, INCREASE, the amount of land open to the public to hunt?" Your first two sentences directly counter your desire to have more land open to the public. I don't quite understand this. Your last sentence is another rant I surmise comes from personal experiences, which again I don't quite understand how this will help INCREASE land open to the public. The "No Trespass Bill" in all it's forms is BAD POLICY based on emotion that you, yourself have stated will change nothing. I for one will keep asking for evidence, demanding data, dismissing non scientific emotional outcry, and FIGHT this idiocy to the end. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA