What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
Sioux hockey starts now!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sl1000794" data-source="post: 53594" data-attributes="member: 6974"><p>From the NCAA Hockey rule book:</p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'">25.6 <strong>Penalty Shot – </strong>A penalty shot is designed to restore a scoring opportunity which was lost as a result of a foul being committed by the offending team, based on the parameters set out in these rules. </span><span style="font-family: 'Times'">There are four (4) specific conditions that must be met in order for the Referee to award a penalty shot for a player being fouled from behind. They are:</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'"></span><span style="font-family: 'Times'">• The infraction must have taken place in the neutral zone or attacking zone, (i.e. over the puck carrier’s own blue line); </span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'"></span><span style="font-family: 'Times'">• The infraction must have been committed from behind;</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'"></span><span style="font-family: 'Times'">• The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score (the fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a “more” reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded);</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'"></span><span style="font-family: 'Times'">• The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have had no opposing player between himself and the goalkeeper. </span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'">From where I sat and from the replays I've watched it seems pretty clear to me that the penalty was warranted (tripping) and that the call/play met all four conditions so a penalty shot was warranted.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times'">Steve.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sl1000794, post: 53594, member: 6974"] From the NCAA Hockey rule book: [FONT=Times]25.6 [B]Penalty Shot – [/B]A penalty shot is designed to restore a scoring opportunity which was lost as a result of a foul being committed by the offending team, based on the parameters set out in these rules. [/FONT][FONT=Times]There are four (4) specific conditions that must be met in order for the Referee to award a penalty shot for a player being fouled from behind. They are: [/FONT][FONT=Times]• The infraction must have taken place in the neutral zone or attacking zone, (i.e. over the puck carrier’s own blue line); [/FONT][FONT=Times]• The infraction must have been committed from behind; [/FONT][FONT=Times]• The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score (the fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a “more” reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded); [/FONT][FONT=Times]• The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have had no opposing player between himself and the goalkeeper. [/FONT] [FONT=Times]From where I sat and from the replays I've watched it seems pretty clear to me that the penalty was warranted (tripping) and that the call/play met all four conditions so a penalty shot was warranted.[/FONT] [FONT=Times]Steve.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
L
Spring has sprung-
Latest: LBrandt
11 minutes ago
J
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: jdfisherman
32 minutes ago
Mozambique Rock/Surf
Latest: Fritz the Cat
38 minutes ago
W
Walleye length limits on big 3
Latest: walleyewanker
Yesterday at 10:23 PM
ND Mushrooms
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Yesterday at 9:17 PM
A
Ice angler cheats
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 9:01 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:56 PM
M
Walkin and thinkin
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 11:31 AM
T
Sled auger mount
Latest: Travis wood outdoors
Yesterday at 9:30 AM
Spring snows 26
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 8:17 AM
ND Otters?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 11:00 PM
CO2 Climate Scam
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 10:00 PM
Gilly YT
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:40 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Rut2much
Thursday at 12:53 PM
ND Senior Fishing lic Doubles
Latest: Lycanthrope
Thursday at 10:57 AM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Lycanthrope
Thursday at 10:33 AM
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Thursday at 9:51 AM
April Fool's day
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Thursday at 8:53 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Davy Crockett
Thursday at 2:10 AM
Butter Sauce Eggs YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:24 PM
Some bad ice
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:50 PM
Jerimiah Johnson YT 26min
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:46 PM
Learning to weld..er trying to
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 8:45 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
Sioux hockey starts now!!!
Top
Bottom