What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "Final" SB 2315 - Worst of Both Worlds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="midwesthunter" data-source="post: 255536" data-attributes="member: 4512"><p>If you aren't having problems with access now what is going to change if the new law passes? The only difference I see is the new law would force hunters to contact the landowner about access. I think we can agree majority of the private land out west is currently posted now and we find access. Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think the new law would prevent the landowners who don't want to deal with all the phone calls or people stopping in from putting their land into PLOTS. </p><p></p><p>I think what they are trying to prevent with the new law is people tearing down no hunting signs, i didn't see that it was posted, or it wasn't posted properly. For most of us things won't change much. They are just trying to eliminate the excuse of careless hunters taking the signs down. With the new law there is no signs to take down. Is there a problem with the current law? No, as long as everyone abides by it. It is tough to prove a sign was or wasn't there once law enforcement gets there so how do you fine someone for trespassing when you can't prove them 100% guilty. </p><p></p><p>I recent lost a good chunk of ground hunting ground this year because an out of state hunter drove right passed the multiple no hunting signs the landowner had up. There is two ways to access this property by vehicle going through his yard or one other road from the back side. This hunter accessed it from the back side which was posted. When the landowner went in to feed his cows he found the hunter and was told by the hunter he didn't have his land legally posted and that he would sue him if he tried to press charges. I don't think the hunter had a leg to stand on in court but the landowner just decided to go strictly no hunting for anyone unless you want to pay. I am not a fan of paid hunting but that is a different discussion. I believe I would still have access to 1000s of acres of this landowners property if the new proposed law was in place. </p><p></p><p>I also trap and it is required to have written permission from the landowner or operator regardless of if it is posted or not. Might be another reason the new law doesn't seem like such a bad thing for me one way or the other.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No I don't waterfowl hunt much but do on occasion. I ask for permission for everything that I think I might want to hunt/trap on their land when I ask. Maybe I do it differently than most. There is a ton of farm land in the SW corner of the state I contact dozens of landowners every year so generally if I see a deer, antelope, geese, ducks, coyote I already know if I can go after that animal or not. There are landowners who want to be called every time you want to hunt I generally stay away from them just to eliminate any confusion of I thought I had permission this weekend. Maybe where you are from this is how most of them are and yes I can see where it could be a problem getting permission the night before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="midwesthunter, post: 255536, member: 4512"] If you aren't having problems with access now what is going to change if the new law passes? The only difference I see is the new law would force hunters to contact the landowner about access. I think we can agree majority of the private land out west is currently posted now and we find access. Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think the new law would prevent the landowners who don't want to deal with all the phone calls or people stopping in from putting their land into PLOTS. I think what they are trying to prevent with the new law is people tearing down no hunting signs, i didn't see that it was posted, or it wasn't posted properly. For most of us things won't change much. They are just trying to eliminate the excuse of careless hunters taking the signs down. With the new law there is no signs to take down. Is there a problem with the current law? No, as long as everyone abides by it. It is tough to prove a sign was or wasn't there once law enforcement gets there so how do you fine someone for trespassing when you can't prove them 100% guilty. I recent lost a good chunk of ground hunting ground this year because an out of state hunter drove right passed the multiple no hunting signs the landowner had up. There is two ways to access this property by vehicle going through his yard or one other road from the back side. This hunter accessed it from the back side which was posted. When the landowner went in to feed his cows he found the hunter and was told by the hunter he didn't have his land legally posted and that he would sue him if he tried to press charges. I don't think the hunter had a leg to stand on in court but the landowner just decided to go strictly no hunting for anyone unless you want to pay. I am not a fan of paid hunting but that is a different discussion. I believe I would still have access to 1000s of acres of this landowners property if the new proposed law was in place. I also trap and it is required to have written permission from the landowner or operator regardless of if it is posted or not. Might be another reason the new law doesn't seem like such a bad thing for me one way or the other. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] No I don't waterfowl hunt much but do on occasion. I ask for permission for everything that I think I might want to hunt/trap on their land when I ask. Maybe I do it differently than most. There is a ton of farm land in the SW corner of the state I contact dozens of landowners every year so generally if I see a deer, antelope, geese, ducks, coyote I already know if I can go after that animal or not. There are landowners who want to be called every time you want to hunt I generally stay away from them just to eliminate any confusion of I thought I had permission this weekend. Maybe where you are from this is how most of them are and yes I can see where it could be a problem getting permission the night before. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Wally World
Yesterday at 11:34 PM
Jamestown reservoir
Latest: CrappieHunter
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: 7mmMag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
T
24 volt Strikemaster power hea
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 5:46 PM
R
Outdoor photo request
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 3:35 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:10 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:59 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 8:47 AM
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:44 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Thursday at 9:58 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Thursday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 6:48 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Thursday at 1:05 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "Final" SB 2315 - Worst of Both Worlds
Top
Bottom