Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 147226" data-attributes="member: 373">Ha, was there any doubt where this would end up? Get ready for a couple more threads over some bill that end up traveling the same path. lab. all that was asked for you to show where the dollars you bring up were tied to damage your property causes, can you do that or not? Or are you suggesting your property does not do any damage to others property? Or are you saying u bear no responsibility for property you claim as your own when they do damage to others property?  You went down that path. You want to claim ownership of property accept the responsibility the state tells me I have with mine. Why not address the issues I have shared regarding what the non hunting public wants to see happen with THEIR property when it comes to things like wolves or other species. The link I shared on page 25 ADMITS the PTD is a slippery slope that will face challenges by a public that demands other uses for their property when it comes to wildlife which is a bit different when it comes to the public trust doctrine and case law supporting it. It admits management of this property might have to change to acknowledge those other peoples ownership of this property. So when those non hunting public want to end wolf hunting, who will you as a hunter turn to for support to fight this battle? When they want to ban morning dove hunting, baiting bears any number of other limitations on YOUR usage of THEIR property who will you turn to for help fighting that battle? It isn't "spin" lab, it is the reality of what is happening every year. So oppose this bill if one wishes but to do so in a manner that drives a wedge will not help in the long run when it comes to your "property" and how the rest the public demands it be managed.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA