What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 248944" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states <strong>"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.</strong> Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH</p><p></p><p>Second: Section 20.1-01-20 <strong>Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" </strong>Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH </p><p></p><p>Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH</p><p></p><p>The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? </p><p></p><p>It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 248944, member: 314"] I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states [B]"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.[/B] Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH Second: Section 20.1-01-20 [B]Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" [/B]Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
K
Wood Planer?
Latest: Katiejo
20 minutes ago
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 9:35 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 8:20 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 7:48 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
Top
Bottom