What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 248944" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states <strong>"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.</strong> Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH</p><p></p><p>Second: Section 20.1-01-20 <strong>Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" </strong>Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH </p><p></p><p>Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH</p><p></p><p>The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? </p><p></p><p>It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 248944, member: 314"] I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states [B]"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.[/B] Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH Second: Section 20.1-01-20 [B]Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" [/B]Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
This is what its all about
Latest: wslayer
Today at 12:22 PM
Merino Undies
Latest: wslayer
Today at 12:17 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: 5575
Today at 12:12 PM
L
Northern Lights
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 8:59 AM
F
Representative Dockter
Latest: Fester
Today at 8:29 AM
Sale
Marlin 30TK
Latest: Zogman
Today at 8:20 AM
Velocitor V Stinger
Latest: SDMF
Today at 8:13 AM
Tailrace trout
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:16 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 2:02 PM
SOLD
Elec Power Washer
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 1:26 PM
T
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 12:18 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:53 AM
No Mow May
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:24 AM
Tammy Miller
Latest: Trip McNeely
Thursday at 11:23 PM
Wild Turkey
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:26 PM
Best facebook page ever .
Latest: Davey Crockett
Thursday at 12:45 PM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Thursday at 11:28 AM
T
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 11:19 AM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Wednesday at 8:31 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
Top
Bottom