What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 248944" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states <strong>"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.</strong> Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH</p><p></p><p>Second: Section 20.1-01-20 <strong>Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" </strong>Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH </p><p></p><p>Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH</p><p></p><p>The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? </p><p></p><p>It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 248944, member: 314"] I just finished reading the bill and it still has unneeded written all over it. First: In section 20.1-1-18 it states [B]"An individual may hunt or pursue game, or enter for those purposes, upon legallyposted land belonging to another without first obtaining the permission of the person legallyentitled to grant the same permission.[/B] Which shows it needs to have a NOT before hunting as this statement gives everyone permission to do whatever. SMH Second: Section 20.1-01-20 [B]Entering private land with a hunting license and a gun or firearmprima facie evidence of intent to hunt game.Proof that an individual had a firearm, or other weapon declared legal bygovernor's proclamation, and a valid license to hunt game in therelevant area when the individual entered upon the private premises of anotherwithout permission of the owner or tenant is prima facie evidence the individual enteredto hunt or pursue game" [/B]Basically saying that if you go over to someone's house, ie private land, with a gun in your truck and a hunting licence in your pocket, it's prima facia evidence that you intend to hunt game. What if that land is posted?? Does this mean you are now hunting on posted land and can be cited?? SMH Seems to me all members of this committee to oversee this proposed land marking database is all designated and not elected so how again are the folks of ND supposed to be involved in decisions again????? SMH The database isn't mandatory for landowners so it's usefulness is very questionable and will only add confusion and costs without showing any benefits that I can see AND the old way of posting is still in use which then begs the question WHY DO WE NEED THIS AGAIN????? It's still garbage legislation that is unneeded, unwanted, will cost everyone in taxes, adds layers of bureaucracy and confusion, adds increased burden for law enforcement and doesn't prevent trespassing in any way. I hope this thing dies today!! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Fargo PD
Latest: Zogman
20 minutes ago
Z
Twins
Latest: zoops
29 minutes ago
Spring has sprung-
Latest: ndfinfan
52 minutes ago
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:27 PM
L
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 11:02 PM
L
POS
Latest: labhunter66
Yesterday at 10:06 PM
B
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: bowhunter12
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Morels
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:11 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
F
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: fly2cast
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 1:04 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Wednesday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Wednesday at 10:18 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
Top
Bottom