What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 248975" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>Sportsman should see this compromise for what it really is IMO and hopefully contact their reps and get this thing killed. Do NOT be fooled. This so called compromise essentially is no compromise at all. It will not be mandatory so the usefulness of this database will be immediately limited and we will ignore the costs of putting it together and maintaining it and the questions about where the money will come from. Here's how I see this going if it doesn't get killed in the house.......... </p><p></p><p>Any landowner that doesn't want hunters or phone calls will be red right off the bat. Any landowner that already has standing relationships with hunters and like the current arrangement will be red to protect those hunters. (That's where I'll end up. I have enough hunters on my place already that taking calls from others will just make me feel bad when I say no, so I'll be avoiding that all together.) Any landowner that really doesn't care if hunters go on their land, but want to know who is out there will start out as yellow. Then during harvest or planting (think spring snow goose) when the phone starts to ring off the hook from hunters will soon change to red as many of the landowners just won't have the time to deal with hunters and won't want the hassles. The landowners that put their land in green or leave it yellow, will see an uptick in use and abuse due to so much other land being closed (red) that I can't help but think that uptick in use will push at least some of them over to red after a few years. So in essence what I see happening with this so called compromise is that it will end up being almost the same thing as just being a total no trespass state. Which is exactly what the proponents of this bill wanted in the first place. So where's this so called compromise again?? If you care about your hunting opportunities and want your children to enjoy what you have today, Please contact your reps and urge them to vote NO on this bill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 248975, member: 314"] Sportsman should see this compromise for what it really is IMO and hopefully contact their reps and get this thing killed. Do NOT be fooled. This so called compromise essentially is no compromise at all. It will not be mandatory so the usefulness of this database will be immediately limited and we will ignore the costs of putting it together and maintaining it and the questions about where the money will come from. Here's how I see this going if it doesn't get killed in the house.......... Any landowner that doesn't want hunters or phone calls will be red right off the bat. Any landowner that already has standing relationships with hunters and like the current arrangement will be red to protect those hunters. (That's where I'll end up. I have enough hunters on my place already that taking calls from others will just make me feel bad when I say no, so I'll be avoiding that all together.) Any landowner that really doesn't care if hunters go on their land, but want to know who is out there will start out as yellow. Then during harvest or planting (think spring snow goose) when the phone starts to ring off the hook from hunters will soon change to red as many of the landowners just won't have the time to deal with hunters and won't want the hassles. The landowners that put their land in green or leave it yellow, will see an uptick in use and abuse due to so much other land being closed (red) that I can't help but think that uptick in use will push at least some of them over to red after a few years. So in essence what I see happening with this so called compromise is that it will end up being almost the same thing as just being a total no trespass state. Which is exactly what the proponents of this bill wanted in the first place. So where's this so called compromise again?? If you care about your hunting opportunities and want your children to enjoy what you have today, Please contact your reps and urge them to vote NO on this bill. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Sum1
5 minutes ago
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
6 minutes ago
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
28 minutes ago
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 11:58 PM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: BDub
Friday at 11:36 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Updated SB 2315 Online
Top
Bottom