Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Brian Renville" data-source="post: 120244" data-attributes="member: 256"><p>There actually is a little more to this. Dapl in the required impact study didn't even pretend to have met the states requirement as far as the cultural impact study is concerned. (Possible reason for the grave sites talk) This isn't just a native thing, it's what keeps them from digging up any graveyards anywhere as well as other important historical sites. It's required to get approval and must be brought through the state historical society. For some reason, take your pick, DAPL was the one contractor to get a free pass on this one. It reeks of shady pool. Since someone mentioned treaties though it's funny that the US military goes to war when treaties are broken overseas and people cheer it on yet the same folks are pissed when we even think of upholding the ones that are left here. I thought and still kinda do think this protest has a dumb as hell aspect to it but looks like some folks at the state level are getting nervous about getting caught. I hope no one who is bitching about this protest ever complains when companies spill in creeks that run to the lake, meanwhile say nothing when the state lets them out of their fines because it looks like free passes to companies is exactly what's going on here. God forbid the state makes these companies follow the law once in awhile. If DAPL started without meeting the law they need to get the boot and a stand-up outfit can get the job for a change.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA