What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brian Renville" data-source="post: 120276" data-attributes="member: 256"><p>That is essentially the contention. It's not that something slipped through the cracks so to speak it may be that it was supposed to not exist in the first place. When the state and/or feds approve these thing commonly they only operate on recommendations. The problem is there is nothing there, no notes, observations, or anything to even suggest that required work was done. If the plan all along was to pay someone to find nothing then give them future work and recommendations to find noting for another project or for another company later on its easy to see how this could happen. I'm not saying something shady did happen but there is something missing along with an admitted conflict of interest and it's important to find out why. The state doesn't have the best record of holding companies accountable for their mistakes.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brian Renville, post: 120276, member: 256"] That is essentially the contention. It's not that something slipped through the cracks so to speak it may be that it was supposed to not exist in the first place. When the state and/or feds approve these thing commonly they only operate on recommendations. The problem is there is nothing there, no notes, observations, or anything to even suggest that required work was done. If the plan all along was to pay someone to find nothing then give them future work and recommendations to find noting for another project or for another company later on its easy to see how this could happen. I'm not saying something shady did happen but there is something missing along with an admitted conflict of interest and it's important to find out why. The state doesn't have the best record of holding companies accountable for their mistakes. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
8
Put in for the extra Cow
Latest: 8andcounting
Yesterday at 11:00 PM
I Like Fun Facts
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:53 PM
Food porn
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
R
Ozempic Face
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
Small Winchester collection
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:46 PM
Cool new Gadgets
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 7:27 PM
SpaceX IPO
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 4:29 PM
Boat Title or Registration???
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 4:01 PM
S
New toy
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 12:27 PM
RIP Rick
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 6:30 AM
S
Mother Nature's Drunk....
Latest: sdtransplant
Wednesday at 2:48 PM
M
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 10:27 AM
O
China bridge collapsed
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Tuesday at 7:27 PM
T
WTB pigeons
Latest: Tymurrey
Tuesday at 11:05 AM
RR
Red River 6-9-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Tuesday at 7:33 AM
Rain totals?
Latest: Skeeter
Monday at 9:41 PM
T
Favorite Sunrise/Sunset Pics
Latest: Trapper62
Monday at 7:43 PM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 8:00 AM
Tour Level Gold - Sak
Latest: CatDaddy
Sunday at 4:05 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom