What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obi-Wan" data-source="post: 120458" data-attributes="member: 709"><p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells.</p><p></p><p>In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states.</p><p></p><p>The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obi-Wan, post: 120458, member: 709"] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells. In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states. The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Fargo PD
Latest: Zogman
9 minutes ago
Z
Twins
Latest: zoops
18 minutes ago
Spring has sprung-
Latest: ndfinfan
41 minutes ago
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:27 PM
L
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 11:02 PM
L
POS
Latest: labhunter66
Yesterday at 10:06 PM
B
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: bowhunter12
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Morels
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:11 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
F
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: fly2cast
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 1:04 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Wednesday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Wednesday at 10:18 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom