What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obi-Wan" data-source="post: 120458" data-attributes="member: 709"><p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells.</p><p></p><p>In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states.</p><p></p><p>The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obi-Wan, post: 120458, member: 709"] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells. In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states. The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: Shockwave
4 minutes ago
S
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: snow2
9 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Kurtr
13 minutes ago
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Rowdie
41 minutes ago
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
49 minutes ago
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 7:11 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 6:27 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
F
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 7:33 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom