What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obi-Wan" data-source="post: 120458" data-attributes="member: 709"><p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells.</p><p></p><p>In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states.</p><p></p><p>The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obi-Wan, post: 120458, member: 709"] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers evaluated the Bismarck route and concluded it was not a viable option for many reasons. One reason mentioned in the agency’s environmental assessment is the proximity to wellhead source water protection areas that are avoided to protect municipal water supply wells. In addition, the Bismarck route would have been 11 miles longer with more road crossings and waterbody and wetland crossings. It also would have been difficult to stay 500 or more feet away from homes, as required by the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the corps states. The Bismarck route also would have crossed an area considered by federal pipeline regulators as a “high consequence area,” which is an area determined to have the most significant adverse consequences in the event of a pipeline spill. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Allen
21 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Allen
43 minutes ago
Heated jackets
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 7:33 PM
N
Sale
2022 Can-Am Defender
Latest: NDwirehair
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 4:47 PM
Hobby
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 4:26 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: FishFinder97
Yesterday at 3:25 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 2:01 PM
Health Care Cost
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 10:12 AM
Western ND river ice
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 8:00 AM
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 12:12 AM
Concealed carry
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:40 PM
Customer service
Latest: jr2280
Friday at 10:17 PM
Catfish anyone?
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:15 PM
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
Friday at 5:04 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Friday at 4:47 PM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Friday at 2:12 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Friday at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Friday at 6:25 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Thursday at 3:24 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom