What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Your neighbors water
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 384997" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Not all water treatment plants have the same design criteria even though they have roughly the same end goal for water quality. Since the Canadians and Minnetuckians have proven their willingness to sue ND and the federal government, this project would get stuck in the courts and environmental studies for decades.</p><p></p><p>So, let's say for the pure fun of it that ND and the federal government would agree to "treat" the water coming through the Tolna Coulee to satisfy the environmentalists and foreign interests (yes, Minnetucky is included in that for me). One would need to treat roughly 2,000 cfs (I vaguely remember that was the number tossed around as an input to DL).</p><p></p><p>2,000 cfs coming out of there would have to be RO'd for chemistry reasons, but you'd also have to install a water treatment plant similar to what is going in for NAWS to remove biota. Hey, I don't make the rules here, but that's what the courts and those who sued over the Red RIver Valley Water Supply and NAWS projects have sought and largely won through the courts and concessions made by ND and our federal government. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, 2,000 cfs equals 1,292,630,400 gallons of water per day. So, you would need a water treatment plant roughly 65 times the size of the Fargo one and it would also have to remove biota to the nine 9's according to Canada.</p><p></p><p>Oh yeah, and that doesn't deliver a single drop of drinking water. That's just what would be expected to happen if water were to come out of the east end of DL.</p><p></p><p>Before one gets all high and mighty and says the hell with Canada, the above is based on treaties with Canada and we need to remember that ratified treaties are considered the law of the land. </p><p></p><p>One should also remember that the whole idea behind this thread was one of not allowing your drain to affect your neighbor. Dumping fresh water onto someone else is one thing, dumping undrinkable and environment altering saline water is a whole 'nother thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 384997, member: 389"] Not all water treatment plants have the same design criteria even though they have roughly the same end goal for water quality. Since the Canadians and Minnetuckians have proven their willingness to sue ND and the federal government, this project would get stuck in the courts and environmental studies for decades. So, let's say for the pure fun of it that ND and the federal government would agree to "treat" the water coming through the Tolna Coulee to satisfy the environmentalists and foreign interests (yes, Minnetucky is included in that for me). One would need to treat roughly 2,000 cfs (I vaguely remember that was the number tossed around as an input to DL). 2,000 cfs coming out of there would have to be RO'd for chemistry reasons, but you'd also have to install a water treatment plant similar to what is going in for NAWS to remove biota. Hey, I don't make the rules here, but that's what the courts and those who sued over the Red RIver Valley Water Supply and NAWS projects have sought and largely won through the courts and concessions made by ND and our federal government. Anyway, 2,000 cfs equals 1,292,630,400 gallons of water per day. So, you would need a water treatment plant roughly 65 times the size of the Fargo one and it would also have to remove biota to the nine 9's according to Canada. Oh yeah, and that doesn't deliver a single drop of drinking water. That's just what would be expected to happen if water were to come out of the east end of DL. Before one gets all high and mighty and says the hell with Canada, the above is based on treaties with Canada and we need to remember that ratified treaties are considered the law of the land. One should also remember that the whole idea behind this thread was one of not allowing your drain to affect your neighbor. Dumping fresh water onto someone else is one thing, dumping undrinkable and environment altering saline water is a whole 'nother thing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: Rowdie
4 minutes ago
Fishing videos
Latest: Rowdie
7 minutes ago
Poor Sportsmanship
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 4:14 PM
New MN crappie Record
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 1:51 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 1:42 PM
Colorado Elk - Rifle
Latest: SDMF
Today at 12:35 PM
Sporting Clays
Latest: Zogman
Today at 10:56 AM
Insanity in Oregon
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 12:47 AM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
Elon's Damascus 1911 YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
YOUTH TAG
Latest: Coyote Hunter
Yesterday at 9:14 PM
Battery draw…boat question
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 8:14 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 3:52 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Bullsnake
Yesterday at 3:30 PM
L
Dont Forget
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 12:23 PM
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 11:29 AM
A win for Sportsmen
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 10:00 AM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:14 PM
The Outfitters North Minot (WOW)
Latest: Duckslayer100
Thursday at 1:59 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Allen Gamble
Thursday at 11:03 AM
RR
Red River 5-28-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Thursday at 8:48 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Your neighbors water
Top
Bottom