Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Retired Educator" data-source="post: 395758" data-attributes="member: 3373">Would be interesting to hear someone who believes the converse of this man's research. In all my years of hunting deer (about 60 years), it has now become dangerous to feed deer just recently? Every&nbsp; year I observe deer yarding up. Sometimes hundreds of deer bunched together to feed and create trails to the feed. Now that is a problem. Lately is seems that one of the big emphasis on solving this problem (not sure it's even a problem) is federal money. Create a problem so federal money comes in and allows you to solve a problem that doesn't exist.Is there any evidence that contradicts this man's years of research and study. I recently read an article where a state was testing for CWD with a simple test such as a swab or the nose or something other that was just as simple. Testing was done on heads that were turned in. Forget the real numbers but a number of deer came back positive but when a more thorough test was done the number dropped way down. But in the report the number of positives from the first test did not go down. A main problem is &quot;Are we creating a problem that does not exist so we can justify receiving more money?&quot;Interesting article.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Retired Educator, post: 395758, member: 3373"] Would be interesting to hear someone who believes the converse of this man's research. In all my years of hunting deer (about 60 years), it has now become dangerous to feed deer just recently? Every year I observe deer yarding up. Sometimes hundreds of deer bunched together to feed and create trails to the feed. Now that is a problem. Lately is seems that one of the big emphasis on solving this problem (not sure it's even a problem) is federal money. Create a problem so federal money comes in and allows you to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Is there any evidence that contradicts this man's years of research and study. I recently read an article where a state was testing for CWD with a simple test such as a swab or the nose or something other that was just as simple. Testing was done on heads that were turned in. Forget the real numbers but a number of deer came back positive but when a more thorough test was done the number dropped way down. But in the report the number of positives from the first test did not go down. A main problem is "Are we creating a problem that does not exist so we can justify receiving more money?" Interesting article. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA