Lots of sportsmen's group are both sides of this issue, which displays how controversial it is.
In these instances, hunting and fishing were lumped into the same group as oil/wind energy development and we were told we impact the resource. Those wilderness areas have been hunted for generations and USED by sportsman. Monument status put us out and put those acres into more protection, more in line with a national park. National parks are great, but I sure would love to hunt in them.....
With responsible use, I believe this was the right decision (to overturn) and I disagree with BHA on this one. And Patagonia. Didnt they take a stance on standing rock as well? Maybe i'm wrong. But if so, F those guys.
A quick search and you are right
https://twitter.com/patagonia/status/824047397105991684
poses significant threats to the Standing Rock Sioux