- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
- Posts
- 1,811
- Likes
- 52
- Points
- 248
Include a 3 color graph and you'll fool the world.
Always makes me think of algore and his global warming crusade, the science was beyond question, of course until the global warming had to be revised into Man Made Climate change, because the narrative changed.The guy must not have had access to a statistician who could have made it look legit. ::: The dead give away is phrases like " its widley accepted" which means " I and another guy think so".
This is so unfortunate. A good friend of mine that was a scientist with a ND state agency uncovered one of his peers at the same agency falsifying data (ok, he downright fabricated shit to support his hypothesis) and got busted by my friend Bill in the peer review process. Things simply didn't add up so he called him out on it, only to discover he had been fabricating data for a number of years and it included some high level peer reviewed papers. All of which had to be rescinded by the journal(s). After the guy got fired from the state, my friend made it his personal vendetta to expose the fraudster at EVERY SINGLE OPPORTUNITY he could find. The fraudster eventually moved to Michigan (which should be considered on the low-end of science) and he never lived a single day without Bill hanging over his head.
PrairieGhost said, The guy must not have had access to a statistician who could have made it look legit. ::: The dead give away is phrases like " its widley accepted" which means " I and another guy think so".
Well, there you have it. Two scientists working/worked for the gubment admitting the peer review process is bogus. Covid and Chronic Wasting Disease have several things in common.
And how often does it go uncovered?
How the eff did you reach that BS conclusion when it was only by the peer review process that the fraudulent data was uncovered?
Having pretty good faith in the peer review process makes me think it goes uncovered an awful lot less than agricultural fraud.
I only know of a couple USDA agents who investigate ag fraud in ND, but know there are literally hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of scientists who participate in reviewing other people's work worldwide.
You work for the government and I work in the private sector. I see what you did here.
Here's a bitch-slap of truth for you Allen.
.
Does the vaccine prevent you from catching COVID 100%?
How long does it protect you?
Will you need a different vaccine with every new strain of the virus?
Taken directly out of the dictionary:
vac·cine
/vakˈsēn/
noun
noun: vaccine; plural noun: vaccines
a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
1. This shot doesn't provide immunity so it CAN'T be a vaccine, by definition!! It DOES NOT provide immunity and NOBODY has claimed it will. Including those who are pushing it. So why is it being called a vaccine???
2. Viruses mutate so fast that attempting to provide immunity to one virus at one point in time is useless as the virus will mutate into something else well before a vaccine can be developed for its previous form.
3. This shot is EXPERIMENTAL (mRNA) and hasn't been used before. I do not wish to participate in experimental and untried shots for something that threatens me with a < 0.05 % chance of mortality.
4. As this shot is EXPERIMENTAL it is IMPOSSIBLE to tell my what the effectiveness of this shot will be against the present virus or any future virus.
To get the shot or to not get the shot....hmmmmmmmmm