I don't see it as such a problem. Guide and client numbers per square mile of water here pale in comparison to other lakes in Minnesota and canada.
momma says people like you are the devil
![]()
The problem with DL, especially on the walleye side. Yes, its a big lake but I would estimate that 20-25% of the lake area holds over 80% of the fish. So I do not think you can compare Devils Lake to a Lake of the Woods at all, so totally different
Twould be interesting SDMF. I don't worry about guides to much as they are an indication of the fishing success for a given body of water IMO. More guides means there's better fishing. As far as fishing out DL, I'll worry about that when the number of guides crashes and I'm unable to catch walleyes just about anywhere using just about any technique I want. For now, every time I've gone up there, I've caught fish from 3 ft to 35 ft so at this point, I think thoughts of disappearing fish stocks might be a bit premature.
Twould be interesting SDMF. I don't worry about guides to much as they are an indication of the fishing success for a given body of water IMO. More guides means there's better fishing. As far as fishing out DL, I'll worry about that when the number of guides crashes and I'm unable to catch walleyes just about anywhere using just about any technique I want. For now, every time I've gone up there, I've caught fish from 3 ft to 35 ft so at this point, I think thoughts of disappearing fish stocks might be a bit premature.
I'm not saying the lake is getting fished out, not by a long shot. I'm saying there are folks on the lake daily that could provide fisheries biologists exponentially more data than they're collecting via current data collection methods. Plus, imagine the advertising opportunity for the guides who consistently stay at the top of the list regarding success rates for a given species, size class, or time of year (ice vs. boat). The most successful guiding operations could EASILY monetize the data through more consistent bookings and potentially higher fees for their demonstrable increased chance of success.
Have to disagree respectfully. I fish it every weekend may - September have for last 15 years . Fishing has declined . No doubt about it . The peak of the fishing was when water was at its peak . The good news is there's tons of young walleye , the future should be good but it has declined from 5-6 years ago
Guides are mandated to keep daily catch totals. If requested by Game and Fish they are to be turned over. In the years I guided I never had a review by Game and Fish though.
I'm not saying the lake is getting fished out, not by a long shot. I'm saying there are folks on the lake daily that could provide fisheries biologists exponentially more data than they're collecting via current data collection methods. Plus, imagine the advertising opportunity for the guides who consistently stay at the top of the list regarding success rates for a given species, size class, or time of year (ice vs. boat). The most successful guiding operations could EASILY monetize the data through more consistent bookings and potentially higher fees for their demonstrable increased chance of success.
Sak has always been a boom or bust fishery. One year away from a smelt die off of flood or drought. Devils lake on the other hand is a natural lake that is not so cyclic. Surprises me that the G&F doesn’t do a little more to protect ND’s pride and joy fishery.[/QUOTE]
You leave Goose Lake out of this, you...you...you bassturd!
I don't see it as such a problem. Guide and client numbers per square mile of water here pale in comparison to other lakes in Minnesota and canada.