.243 YT

[svnmag]

The narration is the point. The vid is half retarded. I wish "they'd" put more thought in the pics: Is "dumbass" for more comments? For instance; the .264 Win Mag has nothing to do with the subject other than "Winchester": IMO; the narration is factual and interesting. It does it's job perfectly; in it's "lane":

 

[SDMF]

1:00-1:20 is precisely born of the "Fudlore" the vid claims it will "cut through". I could go no further given the narrator subscribed to the "blows up on the shoulder" BS.

Bots/AI deriving content from gobs of forums or single posters posting all have the same potential "weak point":

Comments and info derived from too much reading and not enough shooting.

I could likely find the precise amount of force and optimal arc with which to shoot free-throws no matter how I wanted to shoot the ball. Overhead, push from under your chin, or granny-style, I could study, learn, and "know" it all. None of that "knowledge" would help me actually make a free throw when I'm standing on the line.....