Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 359122" data-attributes="member: 8117">&quot;Bills of Dubious origin making game regulations instead of appointed agencies&quot;? What about the 2 previous times that the game and fish department has tried to pass a baiting ban through the legislature and it was voted down because &quot;We the People&quot; stood up, voiced our concerns and there was no data provided on the game and fishes behalf that proved beyond reasonable doubt a baiting ban would lower/limit TB. There is a reason this was written into proclamation rather than law through the legislature because they can not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that banning baiting will in fact lower/slow the spread of CWD in a natural deer herd.The Head of the Game and fish is an appointed position, not an elected position. If the Game and Fish has the power to go against what the people of North Dakota want without the science needed to back it up, that is a scary path also, especially since &quot;We the People&quot; have no say over it. Is that Hamstringing the game and fish, or just holding them accountable the only way we can, because when they can't get something written into law they just write it in to the proclamation?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wct12, post: 359122, member: 8117"] "Bills of Dubious origin making game regulations instead of appointed agencies"? What about the 2 previous times that the game and fish department has tried to pass a baiting ban through the legislature and it was voted down because "We the People" stood up, voiced our concerns and there was no data provided on the game and fishes behalf that proved beyond reasonable doubt a baiting ban would lower/limit TB. There is a reason this was written into proclamation rather than law through the legislature because they can not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that banning baiting will in fact lower/slow the spread of CWD in a natural deer herd. The Head of the Game and fish is an appointed position, not an elected position. If the Game and Fish has the power to go against what the people of North Dakota want without the science needed to back it up, that is a scary path also, especially since "We the People" have no say over it. Is that Hamstringing the game and fish, or just holding them accountable the only way we can, because when they can't get something written into law they just write it in to the proclamation? [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA