What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 366422" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. </p><p></p><p>The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. </p><p></p><p>If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 366422, member: 8117"] If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's). [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
7
Melatonin
Latest: 701FishSlayer
Today at 12:08 AM
Big Muddy
Latest: PAIN
Yesterday at 11:25 PM
T
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 10:45 PM
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:27 PM
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:30 PM
Hemp clothing
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 5:53 PM
Bank runs
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 5:00 PM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Trip McNeely
Yesterday at 10:28 AM
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:56 AM
F
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: Fester
Friday at 10:55 PM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 9:33 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:18 PM
Spring
Latest: grumster
Friday at 3:11 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Friday at 10:38 AM
Rain
Latest: Maddog
Friday at 2:09 AM
You paddledoggers are quiet...
Latest: cooter00
Thursday at 5:26 PM
Ruele Lake Boat Ramp
Latest: Shockwave
Thursday at 1:34 PM
zero turn recommendations
Latest: wslayer
Thursday at 12:52 PM
Heads up
Latest: johnr
Thursday at 9:39 AM
S
Minn Kota Ulterra DSC Lb $2500
Latest: Skeeter82
Thursday at 9:31 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom