What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 366422" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. </p><p></p><p>The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. </p><p></p><p>If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 366422, member: 8117"] If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's). [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Jiffy
16 minutes ago
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: 1lessdog
19 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
30 minutes ago
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Jiffy
34 minutes ago
Health insurance
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 12:50 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Today at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Today at 9:53 AM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 9:51 AM
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 9:46 AM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Zogman
Today at 7:21 AM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 7:16 PM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:58 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 9:49 AM
S
BISON
Latest: savage270
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
Yoga
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 11:34 PM
R
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Ruttin
Monday at 6:59 PM
What happened to "htat was me"
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 3:51 PM
N
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: NDbowman
Monday at 3:28 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Monday at 12:43 PM
Can stevie see?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Sunday at 9:58 PM
R
wrong place
Latest: riverview
Sunday at 8:33 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom