What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 366422" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. </p><p></p><p>The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. </p><p></p><p>If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 366422, member: 8117"] If the game and fish department actually talked with landowners in the area where moose presence is high, there would be a pretty large difference between what their idea of land owner tolerance and what actual land owner tolerance.. I just so happen to live in one of those areas and have helped multiple 50+" bulls be shot, and I guarantee you landowner talk isn't much in favor of the population (it's on the decline and I'm guessing tag numbers will reflect that this year.. but the people that live here every day and interact don't know anything about the current population because they didn't take a class on it in college). And access for moose wasn't that hard to obtain, but the last couple years the trend has been different due to a number of reasons. The same can be said for deer management. I'll see if I can get the link to post tomorrow from my labtop or the year by year deer tags given out. For multiple years it was almost double what is a sustainable population and I believe an Ehd out break in late 200s with a few harsh winters drove that population down.. the only one with the ability to manage those deer numbers is the game and fish department.. no one has any input on tag numbers besides them.. and they showed a multi year fail at being to do that, and now the population is below what they say as sustainable but with a trend back up without the habitat to support it anymore. They used to give away multiple tags per year to people to try and get it in check.. If you watched testimony it's pretty easy to see and was pointed out early the exact time in Charlie's testimony on the prion percolating.. the CWD genetic resistance is tiptoed around in that same testimony. as far as the Jeb Williams talking around the real answer.. that was in questions asked to him by senate members (believe it was magrum that asked it, it's been a couple days since I've rewatched all the testimony's). [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Today at 1:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 1:07 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 9:35 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 8:20 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 7:48 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom