Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Riggen&amp;amp;Jiggen" data-source="post: 84084" data-attributes="member: 564"><p>The game and fish wanting a sustainable lion population in ND is the same as the feds wanting to introduce wolves in the lower 48.&nbsp; The ultimate goal nowadays coming from Washington (the federal boys) is try to establish ecological systems that are self sustainable that mimic presettlement days.&nbsp; Which limit the need for people (hunters) to manage game populations.&nbsp; Lions in the badlands reduce deer numbers thus taking tags away from hunters.&nbsp; They are just trying to disguise their true agenda by saying they want to maintain or increase a hunters opportunity to hunt lions.&nbsp; We don't need to be losing deer to lions.&nbsp; Our deer numbers are already low and we have to wait several years to get drawn for a deer tag.&nbsp; I am pretty sure everyone would prefer to get mule deer buck tag in the badlands every 3 years versus getting one every 6 years and having the opportunity of shooting a lion.&nbsp; Also think about the economics of the situation for the small communities in the badlands area.&nbsp; I am sure they make more money on deer hunters than the odd lion hunter.&nbsp; The G&amp;F can spin it any way the want and it will never make biological, ecological, economical or common sense.&nbsp; Hell while there at it don't stop with lions lets bring back the grizzly bear.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Riggen&Jiggen, post: 84084, member: 564"] The game and fish wanting a sustainable lion population in ND is the same as the feds wanting to introduce wolves in the lower 48. The ultimate goal nowadays coming from Washington (the federal boys) is try to establish ecological systems that are self sustainable that mimic presettlement days. Which limit the need for people (hunters) to manage game populations. Lions in the badlands reduce deer numbers thus taking tags away from hunters. They are just trying to disguise their true agenda by saying they want to maintain or increase a hunters opportunity to hunt lions. We don't need to be losing deer to lions. Our deer numbers are already low and we have to wait several years to get drawn for a deer tag. I am pretty sure everyone would prefer to get mule deer buck tag in the badlands every 3 years versus getting one every 6 years and having the opportunity of shooting a lion. Also think about the economics of the situation for the small communities in the badlands area. I am sure they make more money on deer hunters than the odd lion hunter. The G&F can spin it any way the want and it will never make biological, ecological, economical or common sense. Hell while there at it don't stop with lions lets bring back the grizzly bear. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA