What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 391432" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams.</p><p></p><p>It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 391432, member: 389"] This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams. It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Fish Batter
Latest: Davy Crockett
4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL 2026 Deer Gun Lottery
Latest: Davy Crockett
10 minutes ago
Favorite Sunrise/Sunset Pics
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:48 PM
Forbidden Grand Canyon
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:40 PM
Prairie pot holes
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:44 PM
Robert Duvall R.I.P.
Latest: agriffith
Yesterday at 7:40 PM
M
Walkin and thinkin
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 6:57 PM
Heat = melting Horns
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Yesterday at 1:11 PM
NWT
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 11:35 AM
Tristar Replacement Stock
Latest: agriffith
Yesterday at 7:23 AM
Smoked lake trout yt
Latest: Davy Crockett
Thursday at 8:54 PM
gas can transfer pump
Latest: johnr
Thursday at 4:55 PM
Hiking in to find canadas gold
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 4:44 PM
L
CREEK CHUBBS FOR SALE
Latest: Lil D
Thursday at 2:03 PM
L
CREEK CHUBBS FOR SALE
Latest: Lil D
Thursday at 2:01 PM
RR
Red River 6-25-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Thursday at 8:42 AM
Temp Grasslands Closure
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:17 AM
L
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 1:11 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Wednesday at 11:25 PM
Cool new Gadgets
Latest: Rowdie
Wednesday at 9:56 AM
M
Chorizo
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:39 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
Top
Bottom