What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 391432" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams.</p><p></p><p>It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 391432, member: 389"] This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams. It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: Rowdie
5 minutes ago
new reel for all around use?
Latest: wslayer
Today at 7:41 PM
EHD is back..AGAIN!
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 7:31 PM
Mini excavator
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 5:12 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 2:23 PM
M
On This Day 1992 Ruby Ridge
Latest: measure-it
Today at 12:09 PM
F
Life
Latest: fishhooker
Today at 12:06 PM
Mandan Slasher!!!
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 10:01 AM
L
Walkin and thinkin
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 8:06 AM
L
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 7:58 AM
LMB
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Pink YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Mandan Data center pushback
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:48 PM
Teachers
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:37 PM
Jumbo Perch
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 2:22 PM
Environmental Easements
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 12:38 PM
O
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: OL Deadeye
Yesterday at 8:11 AM
Bitcoin
Latest: guywhofishes
Thursday at 7:45 PM
S
The Ears
Latest: snow2
Thursday at 10:31 AM
RR
Red River 8-20-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Thursday at 7:05 AM
Your dream squirrel rifle?
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 10:30 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
Top
Bottom