What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 391432" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams.</p><p></p><p>It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 391432, member: 389"] This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams. It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
P
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: PrairieGhost
Today at 7:24 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 7:16 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 7:11 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 6:54 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: shorthairsrus
Today at 6:43 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Today at 6:42 AM
F
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Fester
Today at 2:01 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Today at 1:36 AM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:58 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:00 PM
F 150 Owners
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:57 PM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 4:54 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 4:33 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Yesterday at 3:05 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: BDub
Yesterday at 11:36 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Yesterday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
Top
Bottom