What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 391432" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams.</p><p></p><p>It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 391432, member: 389"] This is true. The Corps has also taken preventative steps to lessen the impacts of mussels on the Missouri R. mainstem dams. It is also true that this and the expected continuation of cleaning mussels off of important dam features is costing many millions of dollars per year going forward. Unless you are OK with dam gates that don't function. Of course, mussels (and other invasives) have helped defined what the Great Lakes fisheries are today, they are already present in great enough numbers to affect the ecosystem. The real question is "is it better today than it would have been without the little bastards"? One could argue for days if the invasives or the EPA had a more beneficial impact on the water quality. As far as fishing, I am reasonably sure the practices and policies of various state and federal agencies over the years would also be important in this discussion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Free Lunch
Latest: Allen
Today at 1:11 AM
Property taxes
Latest: Slappy
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Homeless?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
We're Number One
Latest: eyexer
Yesterday at 8:54 PM
John Anderson
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 4:15 PM
Sticker Shock
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 3:25 PM
Fall fishing?
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 12:56 PM
migration 26
Latest: eyexer
Yesterday at 12:16 PM
M
Cool new Gadgets
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 11:52 AM
T
Favorite Sunrise/Sunset Pics
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 9:13 AM
Minot minnows
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 5:46 AM
U
Prop Repair in Bismarck Area
Latest: undguy
Wednesday at 7:51 PM
-44 coldest place in the world this morning Hettinger, congrats!
Latest: Rowdie
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
Units closed for doe hunting
Latest: Coyote Hunter
Wednesday at 3:37 PM
O
Electric Vehicles
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Wednesday at 7:29 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: wslayer
Tuesday at 6:51 PM
ArcGIS app
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 4:25 PM
R
Best grinder these days?
Latest: Retired Educator
Tuesday at 2:15 PM
M
Ruger News YT
Latest: measure-it
Tuesday at 12:54 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Monday at 6:40 PM
L
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Monday at 9:13 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Oahe Zebras
Top
Bottom