Remington pays $73 million to settle lawsuit

tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,184
Likes
1,268
Points
533
Location
Minot
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — The families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School have agreed to a $73 million settlement of a lawsuit against the maker of the rifle used to kill 20 first graders and six educators in 2012.

Remington, which made the Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle used in the massacre, also agreed to allow the families to release numerous documents they obtained during the lawsuit including ones showing how it marketed the weapon, the families said Tuesday.


The families and a survivor of the shooting sued Remington in 2015, saying the company should have never sold such a dangerous weapon to the public. They said their focus was on preventing future mass shootings.


Messages seeking comment were left for Remington and its lawyers Tuesday.

The civil court case in Connecticut focused on how the firearm used by the Newtown shooter — a Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle — was marketed, alleging it targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games. In one of Remington’s ads, it features the rifle against a plain backdrop and the phrase: “Consider Your Man Card Reissued.”


Remington had argued there was no evidence to establish that its marketing had anything to do with the shooting.


The company also had said the lawsuit should have been dismissed because of a federal law that gives broad immunity to the gun industry. But the Connecticut Supreme

Court ruled Remington could be sued under state law over how it marketed the rifle. The gun maker appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case.


The case was watched by gun control advocates, gun rights supporters and gun manufacturers across the country because it had the potential to provide a roadmap for victims of other mass shootings to circumvent the federal law and sue the makers of firearms.

Remington, one of the nation’s oldest gun makers founded in 1816, filed for bankruptcy for a second time in 2020 and its assets were later sold off to several companies. The manufacturer was weighed down by lawsuits and retail sales restrictions following the school shooting.

Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old gunman in the Sandy Hook shooting, used the rifle made by Remington and legally owned by his mother to kill the children and educators on Dec. 14, 2012, after having killed his mother at their Newtown home. He then used a handgun to kill himself as police arrived.


Lanza’s severe and deteriorating mental health problems, his preoccupation with violence and access to his mother’s weapons “proved a recipe for mass murder,” according to Connecticut’s child advocate.


 


tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,184
Likes
1,268
Points
533
Location
Minot
This in no different then people suing pharmacies because they are addicted to pain meds.;:;banghead

The pharmacy should of known better than to give out the pain meds.

We really do live in a fucked up world.
 


Dirty

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Posts
1,897
Likes
35
Points
181
Location
Bismarck
I saw this shit. Makes me sick.

So if someone drives an F150 through a crowd of people, families of the victims can now sue Ford?
Or if someone detonates a bomb the families of the victims can sue Scott’s fertilizer company?
The list goes on…blame everyone and everything for what some crazy SOB does.
This is so fucked up and half the world celebrates it as a victory of some sort.

What exactly did this fix for the parents who lost their kids? Not a goddam thing.
But rest assured, they will continue to pass the pain on to a bunch of other folks who had nothing to do with it. At least some crooked ass lawyers will line their pockets, as that seems to be the goal apparently.
 
Last edited:

Colt45

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
1,070
Likes
215
Points
248
[FONT=&quot]This could be the beginning of the end of gun manufacturers... looks to be a complicated mess as Remington has been out of business for a while, talk about opening a can of worms


[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]"Remington Arms will not pay a dime to anyone and did not agree to the settlement. The multiple insurance companies that insured Remington Outdoor Company, which no longer exists, settled and paid.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]"The plaintiffs never produced any evidence that Bushmaster advertising had any bearing or influence over Nancy Lanza’s decision to legally purchase a Bushmaster rifle, nor on the decision of murderer Adam Lanza to steal that rifle, kill his mother in her sleep, and go on to commit the rest of his horrendous crimes." Said Remington[/FONT]
 

Traxion

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 29, 2015
Posts
1,740
Likes
348
Points
283
Location
Western Sodak
So they played it on the marketing rather than the gun itself. Interesting. An honest question I have is why didn't the Supreme Court take it on?
 


1lessdog

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2019
Posts
1,501
Likes
543
Points
318
So they played it on the marketing rather than the gun itself. Interesting. An honest question I have is why didn't the Supreme Court take it on?


It will be appealed, They it will go to the Supreme court.
 

snow1

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2021
Posts
1,875
Likes
16
Points
151
Colt,my thoughts exactly,goodluck collecting from a bankrupt company,why not make it 100million,puff your chests up,what bullshit!
 

westwolfone

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Posts
1,830
Likes
75
Points
248
Sounds like the Insurance companies already paid

- - - Updated - - -

Mexico is suing now lol.
 

tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,184
Likes
1,268
Points
533
Location
Minot
One of the parents was on the news this morning, said its not about the money, is about a gun manufacture selling military style weapons to the general public and targeting young men in the adds.

Most of the money will go to the lawyers.

If its not about the money then each family should donate what the lawyers don't get to a charity.

Trouble with things like this is, insurance companies will just increase the cost of insurance to cover the cost of the payouts.

So in turn the gun manufactures will increase the cost of the guns that they sell.
 

Dirty

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Posts
1,897
Likes
35
Points
181
Location
Bismarck
…which is why stocking up on guns and ammo for the past umpteen years was a wise choice for those who did it. There is a long ways down yet to the bottom of this slippery slope.
 


espringers

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Posts
8,345
Likes
1,165
Points
488
Location
Devils Lake
it won't be appealed. it was a settlement. all parties agreed. can't believe the insurance companies agreed to this.
 

Wall-eyes

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Posts
1,161
Likes
458
Points
273
One can only guess the judge and lawyer are antigun bastards.
 

Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
6,585
Likes
1,701
Points
608
Location
Bismarck
What Im really curious about is why this was declined by the supreme court... Was that before a conservative majority?
 

guywhofishes

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Posts
29,315
Likes
5,953
Points
1,108
Location
Faaargo, ND
it won't be appealed. it was a settlement. all parties agreed. can't believe the insurance companies agreed to this.

why not - the rate payers will pick up the tab

guess who the rate payers are? mostly white supremacists - who deserve to be grifted

will likely raise the insurance companys' GEI score

- - - Updated - - -

see how all this works?

guilt free grifting of masses of people.

Thanks WEF.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 93
  • This month: 37
  • This month: 34
  • This month: 23
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 15
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 13
  • This month: 13
Top Bottom