One of my good friends only buys/has the mostly large 50 size or larger objective. I lean towards the 40. Mostly because you can mount the scope lower.
What is your preference and why???
What is your preference and why???
Agree. If I am shooting a light 308 for example I like a 3x9 with a 40mm objective, and like svmag a good cheek weld for offhand. If I am shooting long range and prone I like a 4x16 or for coyotes etc a 5x25 with 50mm objective. Prone I don't want my cheek to even feel the stock.Depends on application .
I am more concerned with the internals of the scope as its an aiming device not a spotter but that said Germany/ Austria are still number one when it comes to glass.Before I bought an upgraded scope for dad's 30-06 and one for my 6mm I read up on what makes up a good scope. For instance is a 1 inch tube that much better then a 3/4 tube and the overall answer that most members posted on other forums is yes. The other is optics and where those optics are made is the most important aspect of a scope, that's why the high end scopes manufacturers today perfer glass from Japan even glass made right here in the USA is superb.
I went with a Burris 5x25x50 with a 1 inch tube on dad's 30-06 its probably too much scope for his gun and his hunting application. The trijicon accupoint 3x9x40 with tritium fiber optics with a 1 inch tube and is a really great scope with the illuminated sites fits perfectly on the 6mm.