What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Targeted Removal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 391566" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>or.. we say that there is other things that come into play besides a bait pile (what the game and fish is targeting currently). you cant tell me that 15 deer that are going to meet up for 5 months out of the same year coming to a bait pile is going to be that much worse than 15 deer coming to a food plot that's 25 feet by 25 feet or a hay yard all winter. I don't deny peer reviewed CWD research that doesn't contain may, can, could, might, etc.. If they are arguing peer reviewed, data driven science.. why contain those trigger points and not look at data from the other side that contains the same as "non-factual or unprobeable". Looking in North Dakota the unit that has had baiting banned for the longest is/was the fastest growing rate of cwd prevalence in North Dakota and that's even with their targeted culling... but since this is real world data and not "probable in a controlled environment" it's ignored or non repeatable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 391566, member: 8117"] or.. we say that there is other things that come into play besides a bait pile (what the game and fish is targeting currently). you cant tell me that 15 deer that are going to meet up for 5 months out of the same year coming to a bait pile is going to be that much worse than 15 deer coming to a food plot that's 25 feet by 25 feet or a hay yard all winter. I don't deny peer reviewed CWD research that doesn't contain may, can, could, might, etc.. If they are arguing peer reviewed, data driven science.. why contain those trigger points and not look at data from the other side that contains the same as "non-factual or unprobeable". Looking in North Dakota the unit that has had baiting banned for the longest is/was the fastest growing rate of cwd prevalence in North Dakota and that's even with their targeted culling... but since this is real world data and not "probable in a controlled environment" it's ignored or non repeatable. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Should ND legalize Marijuana
Latest: lunkerslayer
6 minutes ago
Deer numbers in your area?
Latest: risingsun
15 minutes ago
Congrats Dodgers!
Latest: wslayer
16 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Kurtr
31 minutes ago
Posted Land
Latest: Obi-Wan
40 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 5:06 PM
Measure 3
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 4:18 PM
T
CheeseHeads
Latest: Twitch
Today at 3:40 PM
"Butt Out" Revisited
Latest: espringers
Today at 2:25 PM
2024 srs crown champ
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 1:20 PM
Migration 24
Latest: bravo
Today at 12:51 PM
Hunting the roost
Latest: 7mmMag
Today at 11:25 AM
New ice fishing stuff
Latest: johnr
Today at 11:11 AM
S
Free
Smoker
Latest: Snow Dog
Today at 10:33 AM
New auger time
Latest: johnr
Today at 10:23 AM
R
"Conspiracy Theory" or not?
Latest: Ruttin
Today at 9:55 AM
Long Range Steel Shoot
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 9:52 AM
Big Buddy Heater troubleshoot
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:53 PM
Elon Musk
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Targeted Removal
Top
Bottom