Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 255525" data-attributes="member: 1507">The key difference is that MN and WY have 9x and 30x the amount of public land that ND has, and we can never create more here, due to the same bad lawmakers who have given these same special interests behind SB 2315 the power to veto public land creation in ND in previous sessions.&nbsp; Lose unposted land -&gt; lose 1M+ acres of access -&gt; lose hunters -&gt; lose funding -&gt; lose habitat -&gt; lose game populations.&nbsp; Repeat steps 3-6 ad nauseum = Nebraska.&nbsp;&nbsp; WY Public Land = 60 Million Acres (&gt;50% of the state)MN Public Land = 17.6 Million Acres&nbsp; (24% of the state)ND Public Land = 2.1 Million Acres (Just 5% of the state - not counting unposted lands: &gt;1M Acres)Nebraska is always at the bottom of the barrel for public access (only 800k Acres).&nbsp; That's ND's future if SB 2315 passes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 255525, member: 1507"] The key difference is that MN and WY have 9x and 30x the amount of public land that ND has, and we can never create more here, due to the same bad lawmakers who have given these same special interests behind SB 2315 the power to veto public land creation in ND in previous sessions. Lose unposted land -> lose 1M+ acres of access -> lose hunters -> lose funding -> lose habitat -> lose game populations. Repeat steps 3-6 ad nauseum = Nebraska. WY Public Land = 60 Million Acres (>50% of the state) MN Public Land = 17.6 Million Acres (24% of the state) ND Public Land = 2.1 Million Acres (Just 5% of the state - not counting unposted lands: >1M Acres) Nebraska is always at the bottom of the barrel for public access (only 800k Acres). That's ND's future if SB 2315 passes. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA