Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trip McNeely" data-source="post: 415918" data-attributes="member: 728"><p>That’s the point I believe some of us are eluding to. Is/has cwd always been here all along and the higher use of glyphosate basically “supercharges” the rate of incident and extremities of the disease. Meaning in lower chemical areas the rates are lower and possibly mortality rates lower or nonexistent? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷‍♂️" title="Man shrugging&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /> It’s pretty obvious that a lot more research (unbiased) needs to be done before we just accept complete slaughter or complete government overreach into this. How the fuck do you study mortality rates of a disease or the disease in general when you kill off your populations <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷‍♂️" title="Man shrugging&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Trip McNeely, post: 415918, member: 728"] That’s the point I believe some of us are eluding to. Is/has cwd always been here all along and the higher use of glyphosate basically “supercharges” the rate of incident and extremities of the disease. Meaning in lower chemical areas the rates are lower and possibly mortality rates lower or nonexistent? 🤷‍♂️ It’s pretty obvious that a lot more research (unbiased) needs to be done before we just accept complete slaughter or complete government overreach into this. How the fuck do you study mortality rates of a disease or the disease in general when you kill off your populations 🤷‍♂️ [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA